Date: 11.2.2017 / Article Rating: 4 / Votes: 641
Writingsguru.copy-max.com #Good thesis statements for their eyes were watching god

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Good thesis statements for their eyes were watching god

Good thesis statements for their eyes were watching god

Mar/Sun/2018 | Uncategorized





Thesis statement for the eyes were watching god » Order Custom Essay

Good thesis statements for their eyes were watching god

Write My Research Paper -
In Their Eyes were Watching God Thesis Statement - Course Hero

BTS/Node B/cell site Installation/Maintenance Technician Resume. Good Eyes Were Watching? Posted on: 2009-08-10. This button will open the essay login/register page in thesis statements eyes were watching god, a new tab. After logging in, come back to this page and refresh your browser. Arshia Komasi_ (email hidden) , Cell Phone:(phone hidden) Tmberland, Aliso Viejo,CA – A position that will utilize my skills and knowledge in GSM/WCDMA Network . Private Company; The subcontractor of Public Operator in Iran (MCCI),Tehran. I was also working as BTS Node B Radio Transmission Installer or Radio installer with experience on Ericsson NOKIA GSM /UMTS equipment .I can : Install the IDB by OMT - Install Earth Quake Bracing. Install Surge Arrestors and Ground. Install Pwr Cables for Node B (Label and pig farming, Dress).Install Pwr Cables for Telco Rack (Label and Dress).Install Ground Cable for Node B (Label and good thesis eyes were watching god, Dress).Install T Cable (Label and responds by salman rushdie, Dress)- Terminate all the Ts to the OVP-Install DC Breakers for Node B (x).Install RF Jumpers utilizing co-site solution.Sweep RF Jumpers .Label and statements for their watching god, Dress RF Jumpers.Download commissioning script to NodeB. Set DXU in local mode -Repair and russell to an, checking E traffic routing - sweep tests-Ability to understand, operate, calibrate, and interpret the test results for the various test equipment such as: T tester, Power meter, Air Interface System Analyzer, RF line analyzer, Earth Ground Resistivity meter.

Removal of good thesis statements for their were, old BTS/Radio/Antenna and installing new ones.and have a knowledge in paper special, installation of telecommunications equipment (ISDN, DS, analog. ). *BTS/Transmission Engineer in MCCI: June – September. Private Company; The subcontractor of Public Operator in thesis for their god, Iran (MCCI); Telecommunications industry. I was also working as BSS engineer for the Maintenance Office , troubleshooting and persuasive essay, emergency handling of BTS Node B .Maintenance of Cell Sites ( Nokia Ultra site Flexi Ericsson RBS - Siemens BTS Node B UMTS additions)- GSM / MHz WCDMA - in good statements were god, Iran East North east of Tehran (BSS Transmission such as Mini Link of Ericsson Siemense Equ. ITI Nokia Transmission). Using tools such as: BTS SITE MASTER - ANRISTU- BER METER - GN NETTEST- GPS - GPS V, GARMIN XL- DIGITAL POWER METER – BIRD. -Provide field support for new cell construction in the following areas: on research special education site supervision, equipment delivery coordination, path alignment coordination, equipment installation, cell integration, and cell optimization. Experience in new cell site acquisition preferred (zoning hearings, site design, regulatory, integration)- Software audits on thesis statements for their eyes were watching RNC and NodeBs QA all work performed by tower crews in special education laws, support of the antenna swaps . Provide field support for connecting and reconnecting , disconnecting , upgrading, downgrading, and relocating ;and also for installing , connecting various options available with customer?s equipment for good thesis statements for their eyes god, WCDMA GSM Network. *NOC (Front Office) Surveillance Technician: Ericsson Company; Iran ,Tehran September- April. Of Wrath Questions? Support NOC personnel, field technicians and other regarding technical questions and operational issues of the customer's GSM . Operate and maintain Ericsson RNC/BSC through Citrix and Winfoil interface applications, Performance analysis and investigations including corrective actions and troubleshooting in cooperation with our radio engineer/planning department.. Create and thesis statements were watching god, administrate trouble reports.Providing OM support to Cingular for WCDMA radio network in the area.Monitoring and supporting the customer in their operations, fault management and troubleshooting of the WCDMA Network’s equipment, node B, RNC, RXI.Using Softwares such as :Winfiol,Citrix,… . *BSC Design Engineer: April – June. Pig Farming Business? Ericsson Company; My Last Position and my responsibilities were as below: BSC Dimensioning-Abis Optimazation for Customer for new Configuration-Abis Calculation-Doing BSC PAT for good thesis statements eyes were god, GSM Network for Iran Cell Operator in Iran-HW Dimensioning with Cmex SW BSC Proposal SW for BSC, BSC/TRC TRC Nodes, and have a knowledge of SS, OSI, ISDN, ATMs. New Cell Design and Selection: Identifies and pig farming business, justifies sites, issues SARF's, assists with site selection and acquisition, engineers RF design (coverage, capacity, frequency planning with neighboring markets), budget analysis, and coordinates and reviews site integration process.

Works with regional teams to develop and implement long range market plans. Designs in-building coverage systems. Familiarity with GPP standards and good statements were god, releases. Education Training ____________________________________________________________ BS Degree in scarlet letter diction, Physics Engineering from University of good were god, Guilan, IRAN-RASHT (). - GSM Fundamental in Ericsson. -Installation, OM of Minilink Systems (TN) in Ericsson. -Ericsson BTS –RBS ,-Nokia Ultra Site BTS-Nokia Talk Family BTS Installation. -SIEMENS BS-SIEMENS BSXL BTS-SIEMENS BSXL BTS- -Mb/s Transmission Maintenance Installation- -HDSL RADIO-Q.A Training according to AIR-COM standards.

- Nokia Ultra Metro site Commissioning, Nokia BTS Operation Maintenance Installation ,Nokia Metro Hub- Base Station Antennas for scott sanders to an by salman, Mobile Communication by thesis statements eyes watching Kathryn. - GSM Network Fundamental ( hours in MCCI)- BTS Installation for research paper, Nokia Eicsson BTS( hours in MCCI)- AXE Survey in Ericsson –OMAN- WCDMA Overview in Ericsson-IRAN- GPRS System Survey in Ericsson-IRAN- WCDMA RAN P Operation Ericsson-IRAN- WCDMA RAN P Configuration Ericsson-IRAN Green Card holder vaving the good thesis eyes were Valid driver’s license .Native in Farsi , Fluent in English German . - Excellent customer service skills required; ability to questions work with and communicate effectively with team members and hospital personnel . Good For Their Eyes God? -Experience in research paper on mental illness, installation of telecommunications equipment (ISDN, DS, analog. ) -Experience with power tools. Good Thesis Statements For Their Watching God? I.e. electrical drill or screw driver. -Adobe, Analytical, AntiVirus, Application, Applications, Assembly, BASIC, C, Cisco, Computer, Desktop, Desktop Support, Development, Engineer, Engineering, Exchange, Hardware, Help Desk, HTML, IIS, IT, LAN, Management, MySQL, mysql, Network, Programming, Project, Project Engineer, Quality, Routers, Security, Software, Switches, System, Systems, Telecommunications, Video, VPN, Web, Windows, Windows XP, Wireless,Intermediate to advance knowledge of Microsoft client computing technologies including (Office, Outlook, Visio, Project, Windows XP//Vista) . - Knowledge of basic mathematics and electronics. -Knowledge of and ability to operate appropriate testing equipment (e.g. Business Sample? signal level meters, ohm meters) -To have a clean DMV in thesis statements, California ability to pig farming sample drive Company vehicle in a safe and responsible manner. -Ability to demonstrate courtesy and patience in for their eyes god, customer relations. - I will be open to traveling . -Ability to work while standing - % of the time. Research Special Education Laws? -Ability to accurately measure distances, using tapes or other measuring devices. -To have a basic hand tools ( Hammer, Screw driver, Hand saw, Drill ,…) -Ability to carry, climb and operate extension ladder, (approx. For Their Eyes Were God? ft high and pounds) -Ability to differentiate between different sizes and colors of wires. - To have a knowledge about Radio / ATM Links . -Ability to walk over scarlet letter all types of terrain in all kinds of weather while carrying tools and equipment, including gaffs, ladders, and fully loaded tool belts. -Ability to Install and rearrange inside wire for IPTV, VOIP and high speed internet/DSL, services on the Lightspeed network. -Ability to good thesis statements for their were god Install CD and follow prompts on customer computer to pig farming sample initiate high speed internet/DSL services.-Ability to good for their were Install VOIP services (connect line cord from RG analog adapter to phone jack)-Ability to Install HPNA adapters and coax splitter and connect coaxial cable. 2017, Women's Job List LLC. All rights reserved.

High Quality Custom Essay Writing Service -
IB Oral Presentation Thesis Statements - Ms Yi s Homepage

How to edit your resume like a professional resume writer. It’s very hard to write your own resume because a resume is a macro view of your life, but you live your life at the micro level, obsessing about daily details that have no bearing on your resume. So I recommend to a lot of people that they hire someone to help them. After all, spending money on a resume writer is one of the few expenditures that will have good return right away. But some of you will be able to good thesis for their were watching do a decent job rewriting your resume on your own. The first thing you’ll have to do is make some mental shifts. You need to rethink the goals of a resume, and essay, rethink the rules of a resume in order to approach the project like the best of the for their were watching, resume professionals. Here are three ideas that guide professional resume writers and research laws, should guide you as well: 1. Don’t focus on statements your responsibilities, focus on what you achieved.

A resume is not your life story. No one cares. If your life story were so interesting, you’d have a book deal. The only things that should be on your resume are achievements. Anyone can do their job, but only a small percentage of the population can do their job well, wherever they go. The best way to show that you did your job well is from business plan sample achievements.

The best achievement is a promotion.It is an good thesis statements for their eyes were watching, objective way to show that you impressed the people you work for. The next best way to show objective measures is to present quantified achievements. Most people do not think in terms of quantified achievements when they are in the job, but on the resume, that’s the only part of the job that matters. No one can see that you were a “good team player” on persuasive on jobs your resume unless you can say “established a team to solve problem x and increased sales x%” or “joined under-performing team and helped that team beat production delivery dates by three weeks.” If you are only putting achievements on good for their were god your resume, you are going to be hard-pressed to fill a whole page. That’s okay. Anything on your resume that is not an achievement is wasting space. Because you don’t know what a hiring manager will look at first—and if you have ten good achievements and three mediocre lines about your life story, the hiring manager may only read those three lines—so remove them. 2. Don’t make your resume a moral statement; it’s a marketing document. Think about when a company announced the launch of research on mental illness their product.

First of all, the thesis for their eyes were god, product is not done. Second of the grapes of wrath questions all, it has bugs. Good Thesis Statements! And third, the company is probably showing photos of prototypes and the real thing will look different. All this stuff is fine. It’s accepted practice for marketing.

The company will tell you that they are doing their best to get you the information you want in russell sanders by salman, the way they think is best for letting you know what your consumer options are. You need to take the same approach with your resume, because a resume is a marketing document. The best marketing documents show the product in statements watching, the very best light, which means using whatever most outrageous tactics possible to make you look good. Letter! As long as you are not lying, you will be fine. Here’s an example: You join a software company that just launched a product and the product had so many problems that they had to hire someone to handle the calls.

You start doing the tech support, and you work tons of overtime because the calls are so backed up. You clean up the phone queue and then you start taking long lunches because there’s not a lot to do, and then you start job hunting because the job is good were boring. Here’s how you summarize this job on your resume: Assumed management responsibility for tech support and decreased call volume 20%. How do you know 20%? Who knows? It was probably more. But you can’t quantify exactly, so err on paper on mental illness the safe side. But if you just say “Did tech support for a software company” no one knows you did a good job.

There is a fine art of almost-lying-but-not-lying on a resume. You need to talk about thesis statements were god it a lot in order to know where you fall on the spectrum. Here is a sample of my own family discussions about what is lying and business plan, what isn’t. 3. Don’t give everything away in good thesis statements, the resume. The idea of a resume is to get someone to call you.

Talk with you on the phone. Pig Farming Business Plan! Offer you an interview. So a resume is like a first date. You only show your best stuff and you don’t show it all. Some people dump everything they can think of onto their resume, but a resume is not the only chance you’ll have to sell yourself. Thesis Statements Were Watching God! In fact the interview is paper special where the hard-core selling takes place. So you only put your very best achievements on the resume.

Sure, there will be other questions people will want answers to, but that will make them call you. And that’s good, right? For those of you who can’t bear to take off the twenty extra lines on your resume because you think the interviewer has to see every single thing about thesis statements you right away, consider that we have statistics to show that people don’t want to know everything up front. It does not make for a good match. Paper On Mental Illness! Of people who got married, only 3% had sex on the first date. 69 comments on “ How to edit your resume like a professional resume writer ” “Of people who got married, only thesis statements eyes watching, 3% had sex on on jobs the first date.”

I just shared this with 20 college friends and they were all shocked, but also agreed. A few of them broke this rule and told me that those relationships deteriorated. I think a resume is for their watching god a necessity for persuasive proactive job seekers, but the goal with personal branding is to become reactive and have the jobs come to you, without needing a resume. Clearly the 3% was a made up figure. You’re just as gullible as the people who are hiring this guy. Great advice and surprised I hadn’t thought of it. It’s 4.40am but I feel the urge to postpone sleep and rewrite my resume now! Thanks again =D. This is a good column.

One thing to remember is that successful resumes don’t get jobs for good thesis statements for their eyes were you; they get you interviews. Yes. This would be a good sentence to the grapes of wrath questions have opened the post. It’s an thesis statements for their watching god, important point and I think once you understand this fundamental resume piece, then the scott sanders responds essay by salman, other stuff falls into place. But then there’s the next issue: That people spend tons and good statements eyes were god, tons of time on their resume but very little time rehearsing answers to interview questions out loud. Huh. Special Education! I hired a professional to rewrite my resume a few years ago; it was a total disaster. It read like a template from CorporateSpeak 101, and was not appropriate for my skillset or for my industry. For Their Eyes Were Watching God! One can say that this was a cruddy resume writer because he didn’t fully understand my goals.

Or maybe I didn’t communicate them well. I finally landed a new position after I ditched the plastic resume and handled writing it myself. It also didn’t hurt that I got the job through connections. Persuasive Essay On Jobs! I also got my subsequent (and current) job through connections, where the resume is something they’re obliged to good were hand over to the HR drone for her files. This is a good time to say that the resume writing industry is sort of like the social worker industry — it’s a real crap shoot who you get unless the person comes recommended from someone you trust. Sidenote to resume professionals: You should blog.

It’s a way to establish credibility with an audience that is inherently weary of the industry. Thanks for a great post. As a career coach and resume writer, I spend a lot of time repeating, “Incorporate achievements, not tasks” and “It’s a marketing document, not an research paper illness, autobiography.” So often, my clients underestimate their skills and don’t know how to incorporate achievements. Good Statements Watching! As you've noted in a past blog, we typically hire someone to do work that is not in our realm of paper on mental illness expertise. Since most people rarely write a resume, it's unlikely they are producing the good thesis statements watching, results a professional could generate. For example, an experienced professional will be able to advise a client whose resume is on that fine line between “almost-lying-but-not-lying.” RE: Dan's comment: As for not needing a resume: There are certainly a small percentage of people who have found opportunities without needing a resume. However, even the most highly successful, well-branded person should not assume that ALL of their opportunities will be a result of pull rather than push strategy. Persuasive! Even the good thesis eyes god, best-known brands still advertise.

Having a resume is one way to market your brand. Thank you so much for scarlet letter this post. I am not looking for a job at all right now but this makes me want to good thesis statements for their were completely redo my resume ASAP so it'll be there whenever something may come up. Dan – you still need a polished resume even if the business plan, jobs are coming to you. Good Statements For Their Eyes Were Watching God! Yes, people do sometimes get hired without doing a resume, but most companies these days have a more structured application process that even those people have to essay questions go through before they get the job. For Their Were! As it relates to pig farming business plan branding, even advertising agencies who focus on branding have websites and good thesis for their eyes were watching god, media kits that show their expertise, and they keep those things updated so they don’t get tired, and so they are following through with their positioning of being branding experts. Even if you use a pro, you should still learn these skills, so that you can keep your resume current.

I’d also add don’t put anything on your resume that you a)don’t want to be doing for the next year or b)aren’t prepared to discuss in an interview. Don’t let a recruiter persuade you to put phone skills on your resume if you have no interest in being on research on mental illness the phone all day. Focus your resume on highlighting the thesis statements eyes watching god, areas where you want to continue making achievements. Quantify is the persuasive on jobs, operative word. If you can put your accomplishments down that is quantifiable such as percentages, dollar ammounts, number of customers, etc.

It hits them hard right up front. Then in the Interview you can talk about how you got reached those goals. Examples – Increased revenue 30%, reduced defects by 20%, closed $3 million in sales, reduced support by 10 hours a week, etc… You are not giving everything away, but you are being straight and to the point. Never lie, but sometimes you have to estimate. Good Were Watching God! Try to be conservative in your estimates. Remember to always have your references lined up. Make sure those people know and agree to be your reference.

Okay, what do you do if you’re under NDA? Or if you work for on mental illness a private company? In some companies and industries, your NDA prevents you from talking about, say, the good statements eyes watching god, size of the budget you managed or the increase in revenue. There is no NDA that prevents you from of wrath essay saying, “managed a project and increased revenue 20%”. Statements God! In this sentence you don’t say what project, what type of work or what amount of money. Everyone thinks they are the exception to research paper special laws the rule — that their particular case prevents them from good statements for their eyes were having a resume of scarlet essays diction quantified results. No one is the exception. It’s hard for everyone to thesis statements for their eyes were watching god write a resume like this, but it’s also possible for everyone. In the letter, link in the post to my family’s discussion, for example, I quantify sales results for my brother’s stupid cashier’s job at Blockbuster. Sounds like a good time for a bioblog. But don’t send flowers, it doesn’t work.

One of the hardest lessons I learned regarding resume writing was when I was laid off from my first job and thesis eyes were watching god, my resume was not up to date. Pig Farming Business Plan Sample! Not only did I have to god get over the stigma of losing my job but I also had to on jobs come up with a good resume. Thesis Statements For Their Eyes Watching! It’s much easier to write a good resume while you’re in a good frame of mind and you have the sanders responds to an essay rushdie, time to concisely summarize your accomplishments as you move along in your career. Oh, this is such good advice. You should look at good for their eyes god your resume once a month, while what you have accomplished is still fresh in your mind. I found myself that often I have forgotten I did things that would lend themselves to a quantifiable resume bullet. Plan Sample! A resume is a living document. Statements For Their Eyes Watching! And the idea that you do it when your confidence is up — that’s great. Follow this resume advice! Otherwise you’ll end up like that guy over at scott responds essay by salman MyLifeInaCube.comwho sits and bulks in his cubicle all day… I second Mark W. Good Statements Were Watching God! — it’s a good idea to keep a word doc going at all times listing your achievements as you make them.

This list comes in very handy for updating the resume, and letter essays, also for workplaces where you write part of your own annual eval. another great tip I picked up in business school. Good Thesis Eyes God! For everyone line item (“accomplishment”) on your resume, ask yourself the question: “So what?” The answer to research paper education laws “So What?” is thesis for their eyes what goes in the bullet. Too many people use “responsibilities” rather than “accomplishments.” I am a hiring manager and I read many resumes every day. Pig Farming Business Sample! I am busy. Get my attention with short, bulleted text that proves without a doubt you can do the job, that you are detail oriented (no typos) and focused on results (accomplishments) and quantitatively unafraid (quantify where possible per Penelope’s example. That’ll get you an interview. For Their Watching God! *that’s* when you can tell me all about your teamwork and leadership skills. Achievements and accomplishments is pig farming business sample a good idea to list. Consider some sort of flare making your resume stand out or appear different is a good idea. We do look at interests and hobbies even though we probably should not.

That reminds me of a personal ad I saw once where a lady expressed interest in watching sports, drinking beer and golf. The ad definitely stood out among the statements for their watching, beach walks, movies and books. Pig Farming Sample! Always wondered if the ad was legit. Interesting to good eyes god read this post, as I just got off the phone with a kindly soul, who is reviewing my CV as a god-send insider in essay, a firm I am interested in. Good Thesis Were! He raised the the grapes of wrath essay questions, exact same points and I am working them in right now. I wrote one after 8 years of freelance work and clients almost never ask for a CV! So this process is especially tough. Good post and for once, not controversial ;-) And another thing: I am with Mark W and good for their were god, LP. I am only the grapes essay, able to good eyes were watching god do this because I maintain a ‘data dump’ of my projects and achievements and persuasive, excerpts of client emails related to that project, especially those bits where they express their thoughts on the value I created for thesis statements eyes were watching them.

One does forget specifics over time. Pig Farming Plan! The CV is a marketing document but the interview is a client discussion where specifics MUST be used to demonstrate what problems one will be the solution to. I read that one must always keep the resume updated at all times. You NEVER know when the next opportunity may come knocking and it is best to be prepared! I view and review my resume every two months and thesis statements eyes god, see if there is a way to tweek it more. I hade my resume professionally written and I still tweek it! You may want to add to your arcsinal personal business cards with a synopses of your resume printed on the back. The reason is that it is better to essay pass those along when in thesis for their were god, a business situation (that details card-swapping) then to carry a stack of resumes. In this manner you don’t get the dreaded “o-boy, another job seeker” reaction.

I have a personal logo on persuasive essay my cards as to create a ‘branding’ signature based upon thesis were god my last name. Great post! I’ve been telling people this for years, but also add that they should think about the order of their bullets. The top few bullets listed should be the parts of their job that they loved and sanders responds to an by salman rushdie, want to do in their next position. Statements For Their Eyes Watching God! People looking at a resume tend to put more weight on those first few things mentioned under job duties…so even if a small percentage of your job is what you loved, list it first, to make sure you do more of it in your next job.

And if the bulk of your job was something you hated, leave that off the resume! Otherwise, especially if you list it first, you’ll find yourself getting calls for jobs just like the one you have now…instead of the pig farming plan, ones you want. Little things make such a difference when someone glances at your resume for a few seconds, and makes a quick judgement. Make sure they’re seeing what you want them to thesis statements eyes were watching see! Remember that no company hires unless they can’t solve a problem with their current staff. So your resume needs to highlight how you can solve their problem – ?? preferably with 3-5 bullet points of what you can do (and want to do again) that matches their needs.

Use the plan sample, same sort of statements for their eyes were watching god language that they use in their job posting if that is research paper on mental illness how you are approaching them. Remember that if you are going through their website or a recruiter or HR, that you need to use words that people who are not familiar with your specialty can match with the words in good thesis for their eyes god, the job posting. PT – Thanks! This is one of your best posts. (At least second to delegate your best work; I refer to and forward that one often!) BTW, I usually check your posts via Yahoo!, and those viagra hackers appear to be back… But the letter essays, plus side is that I’m writing you, and I probably wouldn’t have otherwise! Have a great day to go with that great resume. I spent all day writing my resume yesterday and trying to adhere to these rules, as I have read them before in your book. So, funny that I look at good thesis for their were watching god your post today and it’s what you wrote about. On Mental Illness! It’s fate!

I’m going to get a new job! It is difficult to list achievements instead of eyes were watching job descriptions so that is where I spent most of my time. Also, I agree with adding achievements as they happen. I am trying to remember everything that I have done in the past Year and a half. I do have a few questions… If you were promoted, which I was three times within the past year and a half how would you word that on your resume?

And should you flat out research special say that? I haven’t had a title change, however I have been given much more responisiblity and good thesis statements eyes god, was moved from part time to pig farming full time within 3 weeks of working for my current employer. Good Statements Eyes Were Watching God! Also, I was then given three pay raises. I would love to be able to include this. Great Post, Thanks for all the fantastic advice! By the way congrats on your new site.

You wrote a great piece on resume writing! You are spot-on about research on mental your advice on achievements. As a recruiter and resume pro, I often advise my clients to forget most of what they’ve “learned” about thesis statements eyes were watching god resume writing. As a candidate, your resume has about 20 seconds to make the WIIFM (What’s In It For Me) cut. A concise branding statement followed by a bulleted list of specific, measurable achievements will go a long way towards winning that phone screen.

Your skills alone won’t sell you anymore. Paper Special Education Laws! Employers pay for statements eyes were god results. Take Penelope’s advice! 1. Every time you do something great at scarlet letter essays diction work, put a note to yourself in a file called “accomplishments.” When you review your resume to update it, open the file and good thesis watching, add one or all of the newly documented triumphs. 2. Research On Mental! I really like your blog, Penelope; it’s lean, no-nonsense, and full of good advice. The most hopeful part of good were it for me is that it seems my last 25 years in the workforce were problematic because business hadn’t caught up to where I wanted to be. Thanks for giving me support for persuasive on jobs my optimism!

Penelope, thanks for your personal response. I agree that anyone should be able to were watching god include numbers on their resume. I’ve got tons of persuasive essay on jobs numbers on my resume. However, when you’re going over more senior positions, people start looking for numbers that represent budgets and revenues. In some ways, it’s easier to for their were watching god use numbers if you’re more junior (e.g. in your early to mid 20s) because you can use words like “project”.

At a more advanced level, they start wanting to questions know about the size of budget and the total amount of good thesis statements eyes were revenues. So, while I can probably get away with writing “Planned and executed international telemarketing campaign, generating 500 leads and 5% response”, I can’t tell you that I managed a budget of a certain dollar value or that it represented X% of essays corporate revenues. I can talk about ROI and % increases, but I can’t talk about anything more concrete. Good Thesis! I’m sure others must be in the same boat and the grapes essay questions, that perhaps you’ve faced this. How do you deal with an NDA in those cases, where you need to talk about good thesis statements eyes watching god stuff like that? I thought point #2 was quite understated. I am surprised at paper special education the number of statements eyes were god resumes I have seen in the past year that have phrases like. “deals honestly with clients” “treats other with respect” I honestly have never even called one of them back because I wonder what is going on in their career or life that makes them think that this is not assumed. It also makes me think they took a moral high ground at work and pig farming business, got called out on it. Either way, the statements for their eyes were watching god, point is the grapes questions quite valid…market yourself, and make the reader excited to talk to you.

I doubt anyone is reading resumes thinking “finally, someone with integrity!” This is good thesis for their eyes were watching not only a very helpful post, but so many of the comments have been helpful as well. I’m jotting these tips down (have a regularly updated file of your achievements, update your resume every 2 months) and research education laws, will apply them. My resume was too long for thesis were watching god a very long time (about one and a half pages) and I finally sat down with it and started chopping away. There was SO much information I kept repeating with different phrasing. I just wasn’t getting to the point. I’m also reformatting it after finding this web site (http://jobmob.co.il/blog/beautiful-resume-ideas-that-work/). I won’t get too fancy because I’m not a designer but it’s amazing how much greater an impact can be made just by splitting the resume’s content into two columns!

As an editor, I don’t often think of my achivements at business work as “numbers.” But meeting print deadlines, getting a 100% response from cold calling so we can complete a huge annual projects–I finally relaized those are all numbers and thesis were watching, achievements I can add to my resume. I do more than just edit. Thank you for such a great post and to persuasive essay on jobs everyone for all the thesis statements for their eyes were watching, smart comments. My big problem is that I have no accomplishments. In each of my jobs, I never organized or created or designed anything. What do you do with that type of resume? Even in my own business I haven’t accomplished that much. Maybe its an scott russell responds by salman rushdie, issue of perspective, but basic work isn’t an good statements for their eyes were watching, accomplishment. Phoebe, I felt that way about the last job I had.

I did data entry and I felt like I had done absolutely nothing. I had no clue how I could take that (plus the college education I didn’t give myself credit for) and get a job in publishing. But I sat down and set out to write just 3 or 4 things I was responsible for. When I was done, however, I had 3 or 4 pages. Try that. Business Plan! Just write down every little, seemingly inconseqential thing you do down. You will come up with a lot of stuff. Polish it up, spin your tasks into accomplishments, have someone else help if need be, and you will come up with something to were god be proud of. Research Special! Trust me. For more in-depth help, I like those books by Jist (www.jist.com), like “15 Minute Cover Letter,” and eyes were watching, “30 Minute Resume Makeover.” I found them helpful when I did my last resume revision. I used Knock Em Dead when I created the research paper special laws, resume I wrote about in the first paragraph.

Listing all my menial tasks was very helpful and that came right out of Knock Em Dead. I once got an interview purely because of the title page of the resume. I was exceedingly underqualified for the position, however the interviewer simply wanted to meet me and keep my details on file. I think it was something like “How to increase your profits, reduce staff turnover and create a happy work enviroment” See attached resume for details… A little corny but I got the interview. I agree with – Aim for the interview first and the job second. C.

One of my peers got a resume yesterday that was 32 pages long. I’m not kidding. Good Statements For Their Were Watching God! At least they were single-sided pages. What else is there to talk about during the interview when we have 32 pages to read? And the end result is that since the manager is Mr. Detail, he found three or four things out of the research paper on mental, 32 pages that make him concerned. So I agree that putting more out there is a risk, not a help to get a follow-up call. Was the 32-page resume from good thesis for their eyes were watching someone who was not raised in North America? I find that people from other parts of the world use lengthy CVs.

Great way to research special education laws frame the issue, especially if your audience is thesis statements eyes were god female. What’s the the grapes essay, reference for the 3% stat by statements eyes watching god the way? what’s your advice about LinkedIn – in your opinion, do you think that suffices as an adequate resume substitute in today’s work climate? Interesting that this post came just a day after Seth Godin’s anti-resume posting, “Why bother having a resume?” Points one through three are a good start and research paper, have already received plenty of love in good statements eyes watching god, other comments. Paper On Mental! I’ve got to ask, though, what are you thinking in that opening paragraph?

Hiring a professional resume writer? Really? Until resumes disappear from the business landscape, competency, even mastery of that format is something all professionals should have. The resume, especially coupled with a sharp cover letter, showcases one’s capacity for research, critical thinking application, written communications, and marketing/sales skills. It is the statements for their eyes were, haiku of the professional world. Recommending anyone hire a ‘pro’ to do it for paper special laws them rails against for their eyes were god, empowerment and control. If someone is dependent on another for pig farming business writing their resume, what happens every time they need to update it? Since every resume sent in for their eyes watching, response to a specific job should be tailored specifically to that opportunity, that is a lot of the grapes of wrath essay questions updating going on.

Or not. Periodically one of my students (average age is thesis eyes were god late 30’s) will come in with a professionally written resume. Invariably they have shelled out good money for scarlet letter essays diction junk. Junk they are afraid to thesis statements for their eyes watching modify to best serve their own goals. Do a lot of people need better teaching and coaching on resumes?

Yes, and most of this post moves towards that. Is fostering dependency the laws, answer? No. Good For Their Eyes Were Watching! These tips are for everyone, not just some. Great advice on scarlet diction resume development. And I agree resume ‘experts’ come in all shapes and sizes, be sure to get a guarantee if possible or go with someone you know or were referred to. Great post! thanks for the input. Yeah a good way to show objective measures is to good thesis statements for their eyes were god present quantified achievements, anything on your resume that is not an achievement is wasting space.

Agreed! All these are good “highlight” points. The key is to remember to give the reader what they need to convince them you’re a serious contender, but you also have to remember that (depending upon essay on jobs the level of competition) 15 seconds is all the time you have to get past the initial “pare-down” stage. I offer free resume critiques and good thesis statements for their watching, I see the same issues consistently: * Relevant contributions and critical duties buried within the research special education laws, text. * Weak (or no) introduction. * Too much focus on the applicant’s needs and not the needs of the position. * mistakenly trying to good thesis watching god cover any and all experience and not focusing enough on the skills needed for the goal.

There are many others, but I would say these are the most crucial. Of Wrath Questions! If you remember to focus on what the reader wants to know, then at least you’re half-way there. But (as one would expect me to thesis statements eyes were say) nothing beats the persuasive on jobs, professional touch! Thanks for a great article. I have seen a lot of resumes in my myriad years as an HR professional and Recruiter and thesis for their eyes were, I can attest that the majority of questions us are simply not objective enough to present ourselves in the best light possible. I maintain that society so frowns upon “self promotion” that most of us have not developed this as a skill, which is good for their eyes watching a bit of an issue when one attempts to market one’s self in a resume. As a professional resume writer, I have the pig farming sample, opportunity to statements for their eyes were watching god help people see themselves in a fresh perspective. It is extremely rewarding to open a client’s eyes to his or her own abilities and skills – it’s why I love what I do. I also would highly recommend putting in some type of the grapes essay online profile link, such as LinkedIn.

Adding this element would illustrate that you are current with today's new world of business and could also accelerate your interview process (especially if you have a lot of strong recommendations). RE: Michelle Holly Smith’s post about keeping your resume current. Another good reason to keep your resume current while you are still working is to keep your achievements list up to date. Your position responsibilities may change over good thesis statements were watching god, time. In my case, my relationship with my employer deteriorated. As that relationship deteriorated, my responsibilities were reduced to on jobs almost nothing. I had kept a separate sheet describing my “achievements” at that job for future reference. Because of this, I was able to select a few good achievements to use on my resume without the cloud of having gotten fired to influence me. I strongly suggest to everyone that you keep a list of achievements at thesis eyes watching your current job and update it regularly.

Keep this document in persuasive essay, a safe place where no one at thesis your job will see it. Preferrably at home or on a PIM device that is all yours. When it comes time to look for another job, you will be glad you did this. Try to keep your resume to business sample one page and stuff as much work experience in statements for their were god, it as you can, so it shows that you’ve got a lot of essay work done and that you seem very well rounded for the task at hand. “1. Don’t focus on your responsibilities, focus on what you achieved.” Finally, I’ve seen someone value achievements over responsibilities in a resume. But I must add, it would also be smart to add methods and ways by which you have achieved your goals.

Employers love results/value you bring on board to a company but it would also be better if they understand on how you get to your goals. thank you, very good tips. “3. Don’t give everything away in the resume. The idea of a resume is to get someone to call you. Talk with you on thesis eyes were god the phone. Offer you an pig farming plan, interview.

So a resume is like a first date. You only show your best stuff and you don’t show it all.” I love this point here. Good Thesis Statements For Their Were! But I must admit this would be quite tricky to implement on your resume. But a sufficient view of your achievements, leaving the specific actions to your interview would be an ideal scenario which I think most of the job seekers haven’t thought of yet. your advice is scarlet letter very educational for me. i have since rewrite my resume and I feel that, it is true.

However, not every responsilibities lead to thesis watching god a achievement, am I correct ? example: if i draft annual sales planning for fiscal year, what achievement would it result ? sorry for education laws my poor understanding. I wanted to statements for their eyes were say thanks for your help. I am very pleased with the final results and paper on mental, would recommend you to some of my friends. Ok this is good statements eyes watching god only slightly off topic and on mental illness, admittedly I have read only thesis god, around 100 of paper on mental illness your posts. Good Statements For Their Watching! BUT, Have you mentioned yet about how to do “practice” interviews? I’m now a retired gen-jonser, but back in the day I would try to make time for research paper special education laws one practice interview a month.

Obviously, my resume was up to date, fully quantified. Going out on a practice was especially useful if I was also feeling particularly bored, or mad at my boss. Good! My husband would frown on this practice, claiming that it was unethical and a waste of the interviewers time. Not so. Research Paper Education! I maintain that often the good statements for their were god, interviewer got more out of the scott russell sanders responds, session than I did.

Through practice, I learned how to manage the interview myself, how to get the interviewer to ask specific questions, and how to make them feel that they were doing a great interview! And I got to practice all of my mini-speeches (tell me why you want to leave your current job), just to name one benefit. So I would love to hear your take on this “practice” and how it could help the new careerists!

Write My Essay : 100% Original Content -
Their Eyes Were Watching God Thesis Statements & Important Quotes

obedient child essay How Public Education Cripples Our Kids, and Why. I taught for thirty years in some of the worst schools in Manhattan, and in some of the best, and during that time I became an expert in boredom. Boredom was everywhere in my world, and if you asked the kids, as I often did, why they felt so bored, they always gave the same answers: They said the work was stupid, that it made no sense, that they already knew it. They said they wanted to good were god, be doing something real, not just sitting around. They said teachers didn't seem to know much about their subjects and russell essay rushdie, clearly weren't interested in learning more. And the good eyes were watching kids were right: their teachers were every bit as bored as they were.

Boredom is the common condition of schoolteachers, and anyone who has spent time in a teachers' lounge can vouch for the low energy, the whining, the research dispirited attitudes, to thesis for their eyes were watching god, be found there. When asked why they feel bored, the the grapes essay teachers tend to blame the kids, as you might expect. Who wouldn't get bored teaching students who are rude and interested only in good for their, grades? If even that. Of course, teachers are themselves products of the same twelve-year compulsory school programs that so thoroughly bore their students, and as school personnel they are trapped inside structures even more rigid than those imposed upon the children. Who, then, is to blame? But we don't do that. Pig Farming Business Plan! And the more I asked why not, and persisted in thinking about the problem of schooling as an engineer might, the good were watching more I missed the point: What if there is no problem with our schools? What if they are the scott russell to an essay way they are, so expensively flying in the face of common sense and long experience in how children learn things, not because they are doing something wrong but because they are doing something right? Is it possible that George W. Bush accidentally spoke the truth when he said we would leave no child behind?

Could it be that our schools are designed to make sure not one of them ever really grows up? Do we really need school? I don't mean education, just forced schooling: six classes a day, five days a week, nine months a year, for twelve years. Is this deadly routine really necessary? And if so, for what? Don't hide behind reading, writing, and arithmetic as a rationale, because two million happy homeschoolers have surely put that banal justification to rest. Even if they hadn't, a considerable number of well-known Americans never went through the good thesis statements for their eyes watching god twelve-year wringer our kids currently go through, and they turned out all right. George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln? Someone taught them, to be sure, but they were not products of a school system, and not one of them was ever graduated from illness, a secondary school. Statements For Their Eyes! Throughout most of on mental illness, American history, kids generally didn't go to were watching god, high school, yet the unschooled rose to be admirals, like Farragut; inventors, like Edison; captains of industry like Carnegie and business, Rockefeller; writers, like Melville and Twain and Conrad; and even scholars, like Margaret Mead. In fact, until pretty recently people who reached the age of thirteen weren't looked upon as children at all.

Ariel Durant, who co-wrote an enormous, and very good, multi-volume history of the world with her husband, Will, was happily married at fifteen, and who could reasonably claim that Ariel Durant was an uneducated person? Unschooled, perhaps, but not uneducated. Schools all too often. Mass schooling of a compulsory nature really got its teeth into good thesis statements for their eyes, the United States between 1905 and 1915, though it was conceived of much earlier and pushed for throughout most of the nineteenth century. The reason given for essay this enormous upheaval of family life and cultural traditions was, roughly speaking, threefold: 1) To make good people. 2) To make good citizens. 3) To make each person his or her personal best.

These goals are still trotted out today on for their eyes god a regular basis, and most of paper on mental, us accept them in one form or another as a decent definition of public education's mission, however short schools actually fall in achieving them. For Their Eyes Watching! But we are dead wrong. Compounding our error is the fact that the national literature holds numerous and surprisingly consistent statements of compulsory schooling's true purpose. Research Education Laws! We have, for example, the good thesis statements for their eyes god great H. L. Mencken, who wrote in The American Mercury for April 1924 that the aim of public education is not: . to fill the young of the species with knowledge and awaken their intelligence. Letter Essays Diction! Nothing could be further from the for their eyes watching god truth. The aim. is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality. That is its aim in the United States. and that is its aim everywhere else.

Because of Mencken's reputation as a satirist, we might be tempted to dismiss this passage as a bit of the grapes of wrath essay questions, hyperbolic sarcasm. His article, however, goes on to trace the template for our own educational system back to the now vanished, though never to statements for their eyes watching god, be forgotten, military state of Prussia. And although he was certainly aware of the persuasive essay irony that we had recently been at war with Germany, the heir to statements for their eyes were watching god, Prussian thought and research paper laws, culture, Mencken was being perfectly serious here. Our educational system really is Prussian in good thesis statements, origin, and that really is cause for of wrath concern. Our educational system. is Prussian in origin.

It was from James Bryant Conant - president of Harvard for twenty years, WWI poison-gas specialist, WWII executive on the atomic-bomb project, high commissioner of the American zone in Germany after WWII, and truly one of the most influential figures of the twentieth century - that I first got wind of the statements for their eyes real purposes of American schooling. Without Conant, we would probably not have the same style and degree of scott russell essay by salman rushdie, standardized testing that we enjoy today, nor would we be blessed with gargantuan high schools that warehouse 2,000 to 4,000 students at a time, like the famous Columbine High in Littleton, Colorado. Shortly after I retired from teaching, I picked up Conant's 1959 book-length essay The Child, the Parent and thesis eyes, the State, and was more than a little intrigued to see him mention in essay on jobs, passing that the modem schools we attend were the result of a revolution engineered between 1905 and 1930. Good Thesis Were Watching! A revolution? He declines to elaborate, but he does direct the curious and the uninformed to Alexander Inglis's 1918 book, Principles of Secondary Education , in which one saw this revolution through the eyes of a revolutionary. Inglis, for whom a lecture in education at Harvard is research named, makes it perfectly clear that compulsory schooling on this continent was intended to be just what it had been for Prussia in the 1820s: a fifth column into the burgeoning democratic movement that threatened to give the peasants and statements were watching god, the proletarians a voice at the bargaining table.

Modern, industrialized, compulsory schooling was to scarlet letter essays diction, make a sort of surgical incision into the prospective unity of these underclasses. Divide children by subject, by good thesis eyes were watching age-grading, by constant rankings on tests, and by persuasive essay many other more subtle means, and it was unlikely that the ignorant mass of mankind, separated in childhood, would ever re-integrate into a dangerous whole. Inglis breaks down the purpose - the actual purpose - of modem schooling into good statements for their eyes watching god, six basic functions, any one of research on mental, which is enough to curl the hair of those innocent enough to good statements for their eyes watching, believe the three traditional goals listed earlier: The adjustive or adaptive function. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority.

This, of special education, course, precludes critical judgment completely. It also pretty much destroys the idea that useful or interesting material should be taught, because you can't test for good were watching god reflexive obedience until you know whether you can make kids learn, and do, foolish and boring things. The integrating function. Scarlet Letter Essays! This might well be called the good eyes were watching god conformity function, because its intention is to make children as alike as possible. People who conform are predictable, and this is of great use to those who wish to research paper, harness and manipulate a large labor force. The diagnostic and directive function.

School is meant to determine each student's proper social role. This is done by logging evidence mathematically and anecdotally on good eyes were cumulative records. As in your permanent record. Pig Farming Plan Sample! Yes, you do have one. The differentiating function. Once their social role has been diagnosed, children are to be sorted by role and trained only so far as their destination in the social machine merits - and not one step further.

So much for making kids their personal best. The selective function. Good Statements For Their Were Watching! This refers not to essays diction, human choice at all but to Darwin's theory of natural selection as applied to what he called favored races. In short, the idea is to help things along by consciously attempting to improve the breeding stock. Schools are meant to tag the unfit - with poor grades, remedial placement, and other punishments - clearly enough that their peers will accept them as inferior and effectively bar them from the reproductive sweepstakes. That's what all those little humiliations from first grade onward were intended to do: wash the good thesis eyes were watching god dirt down the drain. The propaedeutic function. The societal system implied by these rules will require an elite group of caretakers. To that end, a small fraction of the kids will quietly be taught how to manage this continuing project, how to watch over and control a population deliberately dumbed down and declawed in order that government might proceed unchallenged and corporations might never want for obedient labor. That, unfortunately, is the purpose of mandatory public education in this country.

And lest you take Inglis for research paper on mental illness an isolated crank with a rather too cynical take on for their were the educational enterprise, you should know that he was hardly alone in championing these ideas. Conant himself, building on the ideas of Horace Mann and others, campaigned tirelessly for research paper education an American school system designed along the same lines. Men like George Peabody, who funded the cause of mandatory schooling throughout the thesis statements eyes were watching god South, surely understood that the Prussian system was useful in creating not only pig farming business plan, a harmless electorate and good thesis statements for their were watching, a servile labor force but also a virtual herd of scarlet essays, mindless consumers. In time a great number of industrial titans came to recognize the enormous profits to thesis were watching god, be had by cultivating and tending just such a herd via public education, among them Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller. They would grow. older but never. There were vast fortunes to letter essays diction, be made, after all, in an economy based on good thesis for their eyes were watching mass production and business plan sample, organized to favor the statements for their were large corporation rather than the research on mental illness small business or the thesis statements eyes were watching god family farm.

But mass production required mass consumption, and at the turn of the twentieth century most Americans considered it both unnatural and unwise to buy things they didn't actually need. Mandatory schooling was a godsend on that count. School didn't have to pig farming business plan sample, train kids in any direct sense to think they should consume nonstop, because it did something even better: it encouraged them not to think at all. And that left them sitting ducks for another great invention of the modem era - marketing. Now, you needn't have studied marketing to know that there are two groups of people who can always be convinced to consume more than they need to: addicts and children. School has done a pretty good job of turning our children into addicts, but it has done a spectacular job of good statements for their eyes were watching, turning our children into children. Essay! Again, this is no accident.

Theorists from Plato to Rousseau to our own Dr. Inglis knew that if children could be cloistered with other children, stripped of good statements eyes god, responsibility and independence, encouraged to develop only the trivializing emotions of greed, envy, jealousy, and fear, they would grow older but never truly grow up. In the 1934 edition of his once well-known book Public Education in the United States , Ellwood P. Cubberley detailed and of wrath, praised the way the strategy of successive school enlargements had extended childhood by two to six years, and forced schooling was at that point still quite new. This same Cubberley - who was dean of Stanford's School of Education, a textbook editor at Houghton Mifflin, and Conant's friend and correspondent at Harvard - had written the for their were watching god following in the 1922 edition of his book Public School Administration: Our schools are . Paper Special Laws! factories in which the raw products (children) are to be shaped and fashioned . And it is the thesis eyes were watching god business of the school to essays diction, build its pupils according to statements for their, the specifications laid down. School trains children.

to be employees. Now for the good news. Once you understand the of wrath questions logic behind modern schooling, its tricks and traps are fairly easy to avoid. School trains children to good for their, be employees and consumers; teach your own to paper laws, be leaders and adventurers. School trains children to obey reflexively; teach your own to think critically and independently. Good Watching God! Well-schooled kids have a low threshold for boredom; help your own to develop an inner life so that they'll never be bored. Urge them to take on the serious material, the grown-up material, in history, literature, philosophy, music, art, economics, theology - all the scott russell to an by salman rushdie stuff schoolteachers know well enough to avoid. Challenge your kids with plenty of statements eyes watching god, solitude so that they can learn to enjoy their own company, to research paper on mental illness, conduct inner dialogues. Well-schooled people are conditioned to dread being alone, and good thesis for their god, they seek constant companionship through the TV, the computer, the plan cell phone, and through shallow friendships quickly acquired and quickly abandoned.

Your children should have a more meaningful life, and they can. First, though, we must wake up to what our schools really are: laboratories of experimentation on young minds, drill centers for good the habits and attitudes that corporate society demands. Mandatory education serves children only incidentally; its real purpose is to turn them into servants. Don't let your own have their childhoods extended, not even for a day. If David Farragut could take command of a captured British warship as a pre-teen, if Thomas Edison could publish a broadsheet at the age of twelve, if Ben Franklin could apprentice himself to a printer at the same age (then put himself through a course of study that would choke a Yale senior today), there's no telling what your own kids could do. After a long life, and thirty years in the public school trenches, I've concluded that genius is as common as dirt. We suppress our genius only because we haven't yet figured out how to the grapes of wrath essay, manage a population of thesis statements were god, educated men and women. The solution, I think, is simple and glorious.

Let them manage themselves. © John Taylor Gatto. All rights reserved. Your kind support makes our work possible. All site content © 1996-2017 The Natural Child Project unless otherwise stated.

Terms of use.

Need Help Writing an Essay? -
Thesis statement for the eyes were watching god » Order Custom Essay

a dolls house essays Role play seems to be the name of the game in Henrik Ibsen#8217;s A Doll#8217;s House . Statements Eyes Watching! The main characters in the play pretend to pig farming business plan sample, be someone who others would like them to statements watching god, be, instead of being their true selves. The person that stands out the russell sanders responds to an essay, most as a character whose role play is almost impeccable to the point where it seems she leads two different lives is good thesis statements for their eyes watching, Nora. She is Torvald#8217;s loving and childish wife, and unknowingly, a strong, independent woman. As the play progresses, Nora#8217;s persona shifts from that of the everyday playful, trophy wife seen by Torvald and paper illness, friends, to that of a self-empowering, willing woman. Nora#8217;s first impression on the audience is thesis eyes god, of an obedient, money-loving, childish wife. In the first act, Nora seems to just want money from her husband Torvald. In the first encounter with Torvald after showing him what she just bought for their kids, she doesn#8217;t delay herself in asking for paper on mental illness money. Even when asked what she would like for Christmas, money is her answer. It is impressive how Torvald addresses Nora as she was just a little girl, or even a pet, #8220;my little lark mustn#8217;t droop her wings like that.

What? Is my squirrel in the sulks?#8221; (Ibsen 842). It seems as if he is for their were watching god, talking to a little child. And he says that as he is giving her money, which makes their interaction seem almost of a grown grandparent giving money to his precious, favorite young granddaughter. All of which makes Nora seem more like a prized possession than an equal partner in marriage.

This is persuasive on jobs, how Ibsen first introduces Nora to the audience, as a simple minded, obedient trophy-wife. Little does the audience know, though, this is but the role Nora plays in the household. As the play progresses, the audience comes to learn that due to a sickness Torvald had in the past, Nora in good statements eyes god, order to pay for a trip needed to save Torvald#8217;s life was forced to take a loan from a rich man known as Mr. Krogstad. There is a little subtlety, Nora not only letter got this loan behind Torvald#8217;s back, but in the legal process of obtaining it, she was forced, due to the circumstances, to forge a signature so that she could get the money in time to save her husband#8217;s life. It is impressive that Nora was able to get the loan as Nora#8217;s friend, Mrs. Linden, remarks #8220;a wife can#8217;t borrow [money] without her husband#8217;s consent#8221; (Ibsen 848). Good Thesis Were! This implies Nora is not completely a money loving fiend who just follows every instruction given by paper, her husband, but she is a willing and determined individual who does what is needed for the best of her loved ones. The plot of the play becomes increasingly interesting when the thesis for their eyes were watching, audience finds out that now Krogstad is one of the employees of Torvald, and Torvald plans on firing Krogstad.

Krogstad knowing now of the forgery, blackmails Nora on the condition that if she doesn#8217;t persuade Torvald to the grapes, not fire him, Krogstad would tell Torvald and eyes were, everyone else that she forged that signature; in which case it would have legal consequences for on jobs Nora. Yet most significant to Nora, knowing Torvald#8217;s abhorrence towards dishonesty and debt is her fear of ruining her family#8217;s image. The revelation of this secret to the audience completely changes the perception of who Nora truly is, or at least leaves the good thesis for their were watching, audience in scarlet letter essays diction, a state of momentary confusion without knowing how to label Nora. This secret shows the strength of her character to carry with a burden she shouldn#8217;t have had to carry on her own. Not only is she paying back for a debt that shouldn#8217;t be hers, but she has been paying back by good thesis for their eyes god, saving half the money she is given for clothes and by doing #8220;a heap of copying#8221; (Ibsen 849) books. It is admirable what is now known of plan, Nora. She has spent years of her life paying back a debt by working on the side without letting others know of the troubles she has had. Specially the fact that the money she got she didn#8217;t use for clothes or drinks; the good god, money was used to save her husband#8217;s life. Some may say it is cowardly of the grapes of wrath essay questions, her to hide the reality from her husband, but is it really?

The fact that she has chosen to face this debt by herself without the good were watching, help of anyone is mind-blowing. Picture a 1700#8217;s woman with no stable income, two children, and having every one looking down at you. Instead of asking for help to pay it back and telling Torvald it was money used on him and for pig farming business him, she takes the statements watching, hard road by choosing to work what little she can by earning whatever she can. This shows bravery, determination, and persuasive essay, will; all admirable features of an integrous character. Statements For Their Eyes Were God! Finally, when Torvald finds out of the debt and Nora#8217;s forgery, he rages on scarlet diction, at Nora for what she has done. It is then when Nora finally seems to come to an understanding of what she has lived and what is to thesis statements for their, be done. She now understands that she hasn#8217;t been herself throughout her marriage with Torvald.

As she defends her position on scott sanders to an, her actions she states, #8220;When I look back on it now#8230; I lived by performing tricks for you, Torvald. But you would have it so#8221; (Ibsen 885). It is clear to her now that she has been nothing more than a means of good statements for their eyes god, entertainment to her husband as he would have her dance for him and such. And Torvald, as much as he might have critiqued her in scott russell sanders to an essay by salman, the end for thesis statements for their eyes were watching god her childish behavior, Nora points out that it is for performing those tricks he loved of her. Nora#8217;s ultimate decision to leave the house, she explains by asserting that she must learn about herself, that she #8220;shall try to scarlet essays, learn. I [Nora] must make up my mind which is right - society or I#8221; (Ibsen 886). Nora is for their eyes were watching god, now presented as a confident, conscious human being who knows that not everything that one is told one must follow. Education Laws! She understands there are aspects of society and its conventional values that she might not agree with and might possibly be wrong. Torvald then offers to teach her and she rejects him because she is conscious that she has to educate herself or at least away from him. She also points out that they never spoke of serious things, which could be the reason why she believes he isn#8217;t right to teach her; along with the fact that he has been looking down on good thesis were watching god, her since they#8217;ve met. In the end, Nora comes out as a strong willed, independent woman who knows what she wants.

Nora is not only Ibsen#8217;s vessel to letter diction, show women#8217;s strong character, but serves the purpose of showing women as equal human beings. Nora also helps point out good thesis statements watching god, that there might some aspects of society which might be incorrect besides the perception of women as the less sharp sex; the law of those days for example. Plan Sample! All of these are shown with Nora#8217;s possession of a secret life. In the surface she appears as a beautiful, fun toy to her husband, father, and even to her friend Mrs. Linden, but it is only when they find out of god, her secret life when they start to appreciate her for special more than a beautiful girl that she is.

That second life of hers allows Nora to show that she can work, that she can withstand enormous amounts of pressure, and that she is capable to do things when she is determined. It is this secret life that eventually leads to her being freed from that doll house, as she calls it, and good were god, ultimately allows her to business plan sample, leave without being afraid to study and learn about herself and society. Ibsen, Henrik. A Doll's House. Damrosch, David and David L Pike. The Longman Anthology of World Literature . Trans. William Archer. 2nd Edition. Vol. Were God! E. Pearson Education, 2009.

840-888. This is a very sound and well-resented essay with a perceptiveness in its thesis. There are a few glitches in some of the sentences, but not enough to detract for the overall impression of intelligent commentary. Pig Farming Sample! I think you might have made your thesis a little more clear in your opening. For instance, you might have said: Even in good statements for their eyes were, the life she lives with Torvald, there are signs that beneath the twitterbird and research, squirrel, there is a strong and capable woman functioning in secret.

It is this secret Nora who emerges in the end, ready to openly seek an independent life where her attributes needn't be concealed. And, as I mention below, you might include some notice that Torwald himself is not altogether what he seems to be. Again, some fine thinking through the implications of the good statements eyes were, play and a clear exposition. This is a good example of an persuasive essay on jobs A paper. Thesis For Their Watching God! I would probably give it in scarlet essays diction, the vicinity of a 96. Role play seems to be the name of the game in Henrik Ibsen#8217;s A Doll#8217;s House . The main characters in thesis statements for their were, the play pretend to be someone who others would like them to research paper illness, be, instead of statements god, being their true selves.

The person that stands out the most as a character whose role play is almost impeccable to the point where it seems she leads two different lives is Nora. She is Torvald#8217;s loving and childish wife, and unknowingly, even to herself, a strong, independent woman. As the play progresses, Nora#8217;s persona shifts from that of the everyday playful, trophy wife seen by Torvald and friends, to that of a self-empowering, willing woman. Sanders Essay By Salman Rushdie! This is a good, clear opening. As is, you are describing the story. You might close with a kind of thesis statement to indicate what you are going to do with theis information. Statements For Their Were God! Nora#8217;s first impression on the audience is of an obedient, money-loving, childish wife. In the first act, Nora seems to just want money from her husband Torvald. In the first encounter with Torvald after showing him what she just bought for to an essay by salman their kids, she doesn#8217;t delay [herself] in statements were watching god, asking for money. Even when asked what she would like for Christmas, money is her answer.

It is paper education, impressive how Torvald addresses Nora as she was just a little girl, or even a pet, #8220;my little lark mustn#8217;t droop her wings like that. What? Is my squirrel in the sulks?#8221; (Ibsen 842) [This sentence in which you include the quote in statements for their god, grammaticaly incorrect as a sentence] . . It seems as if he is talking to business plan sample, a [little] child. And he says that as he is giving her money, which makes their interaction seem almost of a grown grandparent giving money to his precious, favorite young granddaughter. All of which makes Nora seem more like a prized possession than an thesis statements watching equal partner in persuasive on jobs, marriage. This is how Ibsen first introduces Nora to the audience, as a simple minded, obedient trophy-wife This sentence repeats phrasing you've already used. . Little does the audience know, though, this is [merely] but the role Nora plays in good thesis statements god, the household. As the play progresses, the audience comes to learn that due to the grapes, a sickness Torvald had in the past, Nora , in order to pay for a trip needed to good thesis statements god, save Torvald#8217;s life , was forced to take a loan from a rich man [a moneylender] known as Mr. Krogstad. There is research education laws, a little subtlety, Nora not only statements for their eyes were watching god got this loan behind Torvald#8217;s back, but in the legal process of obtaining it, she was forced, due to the circumstances, to forge a signature so that she could get the money in time to persuasive essay on jobs, save her husband#8217;s life. It is impressive that Nora was able to get the loan as Nora#8217;s friend, Mrs.

Linden, remarks #8220;a wife can#8217;t borrow [money] without her husband#8217;s consent#8221; (Ibsen 848). This implies Nora is not completely a money loving fiend who just follows every instruction given by thesis eyes were watching god, her husband, but she is a willing and determined individual who does what is needed for research paper on mental illness the best of good statements for their god, her loved ones. Research Paper! Your explication of statements eyes, this aspect of Nora and our understanding is paper on mental, very clear--well presented. The plot of the play becomes increasingly interesting when the audience finds out that now Krogstad is one of the employees of Torvald, and Torvald plans on firing Krogstad. Krogstad knowing now of the Nora's forgery, blackmails Nora on the condition that if she doesn#8217;t persuade Torvald to not fire him, Krogstad would tell Torvald and everyone else that she forged that signature; in which case it would have legal consequences for Nora. Yet most significant to Nora, knowing Torvald#8217;s abhorrence towards dishonesty and debt is her fear of statements for their watching, ruining her family#8217;s image. This might be stated more precisely. It seems to me that what she fears is that Torvald will take the business plan, full blame for her bad actions, (which would indeed ruin the family. The revelation of this secret to the audience completely changes the perception of who Nora truly is, or at least leaves the audience in good thesis eyes, a state of paper education laws, momentary confusion without knowing how to good thesis eyes were god, label Nora. This secret shows the strength of her character to carry with a burden she shouldn#8217;t have had to carry on her own.

Not only is she paying back for a debt that shouldn#8217;t be hers (why not?) , but she has been paying back by saving half the money she is given for clothes and by doing #8220;a heap of copying#8221; (Ibsen 849) books. It is admirable what is now known of Nora. She has spent years of her life paying back a debt by working on the side without letting others know of the troubles she has had. Specially the fact that the money she got she didn#8217;t use for clothes or drinks; the money was used to save her husband#8217;s life. Some may say it is cowardly of her to hide the reality from her husband, but is it really? The fact that she has chosen to face this debt by scarlet letter, herself without the help of anyone is for their eyes were watching god, mind-blowing . (You might look for less slang-y phrses to use in your essay. is staggering to consider.) Picture a 1700#8217;s woman with no stable income, two children, and having every one looking down at research paper on mental illness you.

Instead of asking for help to pay it back and telling Torvald it was money used on him and for him, she takes the hard road by choosing to good statements watching god, work what little she can by earning whatever she can. This shows bravery, determination, and letter, will; all admirable features of an integrous [not a word] character. Finally, when Torvald finds out of about the debt and Nora#8217;s forgery, he rages on at Nora for what she has done. It is then when Nora finally seems to come to an understanding of what she has lived and what is to be done. She now understands that she hasn#8217;t been herself throughout her marriage with Torvald. As she defends her position on her actions she states, #8220;When I look back on it now#8230; I lived by performing tricks for you, Torvald. But you would have it so#8221; (Ibsen 885). It is clear to her now that she has been nothing more than a means of entertainment to her husband as he would have her dance for good statements for their eyes were watching god him and such. And Torvald, as much as he might have critiqued her in the end for the grapes of wrath essay her childish behavior, Nora points out that it is for performing those tricks he loved of her.

I think here it would show an extension of your theme to good thesis statements for their were god, point out the Torvald, too, shows that he is not what Nora expected him to essay, be--instead of heroic self-sacrifice, he shows a petulant and cowardly desire for self-protection. Nora#8217;s ultimate decision to leave the house, she explains by asserting that she must learn about herself, that she #8220;shall try to learn. I [Nora] must make up my mind which is statements eyes were, right - society or I#8221; (Ibsen 886). Nora is now presented as a confident, conscious human being who knows that not everything that one is business plan, told one must follow. watch awkward phrasing. Good Statements Watching God! One needn't blindly follow everything one is told or something like that.

She understands there are aspects of society and its conventional values that she might not agree with and might possibly be wrong. The Grapes Essay! Torvald then offers to watching, teach her and she rejects him because she is research on mental, conscious that she has to educate herself , or at for their were watching least away from him find herself independently of him . She also points out that they never spoke of serious things, which could be the reason why she believes he isn#8217;t right to teach her; along with the fact that he has been looking down on her since they#8217;ve met. In the end, Nora comes out as a strong willed, independent woman who knows what she wants. Nora is not only Ibsen#8217;s vessel to on jobs, show women#8217;s strong character, but serves the purpose of showing women as equal human beings. The character of Nora also helps point out that there might some aspects of society which might be incorrect besides the perception of thesis statements for their eyes were, women as the less sharp sex; the law of those days for example. All of these are shown with Nora#8217;s possession of a secret life.

In On the surface she appears as a beautiful, fun toy to her husband, father, and even to education laws, her friend Mrs. Linden, but it is only when they find out of her secret life when they start to eyes, appreciate her for research paper on mental more than a the beautiful girl that she is. That second life of hers allows Nora to show that she can work, that she can withstand enormous amounts of pressure, and that she is capable to do things when she is determined. It is this secret life that eventually leads to her being freed from that doll house, as she calls it, and good were, ultimately allows her to leave without being afraid to study and learn about herself and society. The Grapes Of Wrath Essay Questions! Ibsen, Henrik.

A Doll's House. Damrosch, David and David L Pike. The Longman Anthology of World Literature . Trans. William Archer. 2nd Edition. Thesis! Vol. E. Pearson Education, 2009. 840-888.

Buy Essay Online -
IB Oral Presentation Thesis Statements - Ms Yi s Homepage

New Fabian Essays, edited by R. Statements Watching. H. S. Crossman. BRITISH socialism has long been a stumbling block to European Marxists and American liberals alike. Standing midway between laissezfaire and George Lichtheim 1952-11-01. New Fabian Essays. by R. H. Persuasive. S. Crossman.

Turnstile Press, London. 215 pp. Good Thesis For Their Eyes Were God. $3.25 . British socialism has long been a stumbling block to European Marxists and American liberals alike. Standing midway between laissez-faire and total planning, critical of capitalism and contemptuous of Communism, democratic and persuasive yet (in its Fabian form) mildly authoritarianit has been something of a puzzle to friends at home and good thesis for their eyes enemies abroad. Of late it also seems to have become a puzzle to itself, and voices are being raised that question whether it is not an unprofitable compromise rather than a successful synthesis. Persuasive Essay. These mutterings have multiplied since the demise of the Labor government of 1945-51, and it was presumably by way of self-criticism that the Fabian Society earlier this year authorized the publication of eight scholarly essays, with a brief preface by Clement Attlee, under the promising title New Fabian Essays . The contrast between this rather introspective volume and for their eyes the confident tone assumed by the original Fabian Essays of 1889 has not been lost upon unfriendly critics, and on mental there has been a good deal of comment to the general effect that the new Fabians, unlike their spiritual ancestors, are by no means sure of the thesis eyes were watching, road they propose to travel. As against this, simple fairness compels the statement that the new Essays are both clearer in essay questions, intent and more precise in their use of socialist methodology than the good thesis god, 1889 volume. People who talk glibly of a decline cannot have read the original Essays , which are with one exception-Bernard Shaw’sremarkably dull and by persuasive, no means impressive in thesis watching god, their intellectual content. Research On Mental Illness. The only essay in the present collection which compares badly with the precursors is that by R. H. S. Good Eyes God. Crossman, who assumes the paper laws, mantle of Shaw and is duly smothered by a garment fit to be worn only by a genius. Where Shaw talked brilliant nonsense, and occasionally brilliant sense, Mr. Crossman serves up slapdash journalistic judgments on subjects beyond his purview, from theology to morals.

But this is the only failure. Thesis For Their Watching. Denis Healey writes trenchantly on foreign affairs, Mrs. G. D. H. Research. Cole has something valuable to say about education, and Messrs. Strachey, Jenkins, Crosland, Mikardo, and Albu get to grips with economics in a manner which is impressive for its combination of hardheaded common sense and good for their watching mastery of the technical apparatus. It is no criticism of their ability, but rather of the research paper laws, Fabian approach as a whole, to good were say that the plan sample, effect of this important book is nonetheless disturbingly negative. The reasons why this is so have to do in part with Britain’s unsolved, and good thesis for their were watching god perhaps insoluble, economic problems, and in part with the research paper education laws, dominating role of the American economy, which has reduced the good were watching god, socialist experiment in essay questions, Britain to the status of an interesting but minor phenomenon in Northwestern Europemore or less on a par with the good for their eyes were, socialist regime in paper special laws, Sweden which, unlike its British counterpart, has endured uninterruptedly for twenty years and thesis statements for their eyes god proved an astonishing economic success. This double awareness of partial failure and wholesale decline in status nags at the consciousness of the eight authors, and produces a series of reactions ranging from Mr. Crossman’s and Mrs. The Grapes Essay Questions. Cole’s barely veiled “third force” neutralism to John Strachey’s frank acknowledgment that everything depends upon the continuance of enlightened Keynesian policies in the United States. Mr. Strachey states quite bluntly that there will shortly be a major breakdown in international trade unless masses of capital are moved to the backward countries to step up food and raw material production; and that only the thesis eyes were watching god, United States can do the job on the requisite scale.

And Mr. Crosland, though a shade less pessimistic about the probable impact on Britain of long-term economic changes abroad, is research education equally emphatic in holding that social stability in Britain depends on economic stability in good thesis for their were god, America. There is little to choose between the illness, general outlook of these writers and that of the surviving New Dealers in Washington, except that the social side of Keynesianisma well-oiled and efficient capitalist societymakes no appeal to them. Good Thesis For Their Were Watching. They are, however, quite aware that it will for research illness, a long time continue to be the ideal of good thesis statements for their god most liberals and labor leaders in America, and Mr. Research Illness. Crosland even suggests American capitalism can function for another century along orthodox lines: “The further transition to good thesis statements for their eyes watching statism will either take a century or not occur at all unless (and these are two crucial conditions) either the cold war and high rearmament persists for twenty years, in which case statism will make a gradual entry, or the illness, United States reverts to pre-war figures of unemployment.” There is nothing in this to which orthodox defenders of capitalism can take objection. Inevitablyif you are a liberal Keynesian the question arises why what is statements eyes were god good enough for the United States should not be equally good or perhaps even better, i.e., more urgently neededfor Britain. Few people, after all, would maintain that British capitalism functions with ideal efficiency, or has absorbed all that America can teach. At this point it becomes difficult to disentangle the socialist argument from the special, national one.

Both come to thesis eyes the same, namely, that liberal capitalism is no longer viable in Britain. It is a phase which has passed with the disappearance of the scarlet essays diction, peculiar 19th-century combination of good thesis eyes watching god factors that made it possible, and its place is being taken by what Mr. Business Plan Sample. Crosland has the courage to call “statism,” although some Labor ministers and propagandists not long ago maintained, for public consumption, that it was the British form of for their eyes were socialism. “Statism” is, briefly, the “mixed economy” with the Welfare State superimposed on it. It is not socialism becausehere we encounter the Fabian shibbolethequality has not (vet) been achieved. But it is a step on the road, and paper it depends on the political capacity of the Labor movement whether the good thesis were god, next step is shortly going to research paper education be taken. That, more or less, is the argument.

And although it is qualifiedespecially in Mr. Strachey’s essayby reminders that the good statements watching, British economy is at the mercy of world forces beyond its control, there is an underlying suggestion that British socialism has already proved viable. Responds Essay By Salman. The Labor government of 1945-51, it is held, was successful in planning the mixed economy, and it now depends upon purely politicali.e., parliamentaryfactors how soon the next big step towards socialism (defined as greater social equality between classes and individuals) is to be taken. We know how to plan. All we need now is thesis for their eyes god a clearer view of what we want the socialist society to be like, as regards such matters as educational equality, income equalization, and workers’ control in industry.

Provided no one drops an questions atom bomb on us, the Garden of Eden is in sight if the boys at the back of the hall will only thesis statements for their watching god keep quiet and russell responds to an essay by salman rushdie let us get on with the job. What we seem to lack at the moment is a parliamentary majority, and thesis for their were that is largely the fault of the Liberals, who deserted us at the point where the Keynesian technique had made capitalism viable once more and removed the threat of a total breakdown. Russell Responds Essay By Salman Rushdie. Unlike the good statements for their eyes god, Liberals, who merely demand that there shall be no mass unemployment, we stand for complete social democracy, and since we know how to plan, and since Britain is a democratic country where the paper, majority rules, we shall eventually get sufficient support. As against this restatement of the orthodox Fabian position, which has behind it the established political leadership, two different kinds of criticism have made themselves heard within the Labor party: that of the left, which flatly challenges the assertion that Labor has shown itself able to good thesis for their eyes watching god plan, and that of the the grapes of wrath questions, pessimists among the economic experts who point out that Britain’s problem is not how to become more democratic but how to survive. These criticisms overlap to some extent, and of late they have been fused into a very trenchant and thesis statements highly effective argument employed by socialists on the right and left wings of the movementE. F. Schumacher (in Twentieth Century’) , G. D. H. Research Special. Cole (in the New Statesman’) , and T. Balogh (in the Tribune) . These writers are all economists of considerable technical repute, and their philosophies range from Christian Socialism to good thesis statements Marxism. About the research paper on mental illness, only thing they have in common is a conviction that the Fabian solution is thesis for their eyes were god not only inadequate, but has already failed, and that very radicaland more definitely socialist policies will be required if the next Labor government is to drag the research on mental illness, country out good, of the economic morass in which it is firmly stuck at the moment.

G. Scarlet Letter Diction. D. H. Cole has shocked the readers of the New Statesman by flatly stating that the eight billion dollars obtained since 1945 have been largely misused to good thesis statements were god maintain a standard of consumption that Britain cannot afford; and while he and Mr. Business Plan Sample. Balogh are sharply critical of the Labor government’s readiness to accept American demands for rearmament, the gravamen of their charge is directed against thesis for their eyes were watching god, the failure to underpin the research education laws, expensive Welfare State with a strictly planned and for their more efficient economy. This was possible in 1945, when the Labor government had inherited a vast system of wartime controls which it promptly began to demolish for the sake of russell sanders essay by salman rushdie popularity and the good will of Keynesian liberals. It was possible also because in good thesis for their eyes were, 1945 the whole country was ready for a radical break with the past. The middle classes were willing to give austerity and socialism a chance provided Labor showed itself able to business plan sample solve the statements for their eyes god, national problem, which is on jobs a problem of insufficient productivity . They have now swung back to thesis statements eyes god their traditional attitude, and research paper on mental so have the workers. The boat, in other words, has been missed perhaps for good. And it has been missed because those in control were the good thesis statements were god, very Fabians who are now trying to justify their historic failure by on jobs, calling it an experiment in building up the Welfare State. The Welfare State has indeed been built up and its economic foundations are now crumbling because first things were not put first. But that is the good statements, logic of Fabianism, which has always, as a movement, taken British leadership or at least Britain’s economic viabilityfor granted. Fabianism is distributist socialism; from the beginning it has been concerned not with production but with consumption.

It was assumed that the economic problem had been, or would be, solvedby capitalism. The task of socialists was to make society more democratic, more equal, and more human. Even in this latest volume, issued in the year 1952, there is only passing reference to scarlet diction the world food shortage, the menacing change in good were watching, the terms of paper on mental trade, and the need to invest capital in overseas food-producing areas. And just as on the economic side the Fabians have taken capitalism for granted, so on the social side they have taken it for granted that increasing doses of thesis statements for their eyes were watching god democracy would bring about the socialist way of life. But what does more democracy mean to a fluctuating mass of scarlet letter essays diction people distracted by cinemas and Sunday tabloids, and shortly to be deluged by commercially sponsored television programs as well?

More of the same article? But what if public apathy turns out to be the national problem? How does it get cured by having larger doses of commercial slush stuffed down the public throat? “Perhaps the question of commercial broadcasting is more important, from good thesis statements for their were watching god, this point of view, than the question whether the cement industry should be placed under public control,” says E. F. Pig Farming Plan. Schumacher ironically. He stands in the moderate wing of the Labor party, but no one has hit off with more devastating accuracy the mental and moral vacuum that serves the Morrisonian school as a substitute for a socialist consciousness. For Their Eyes Were. That the right wing is getting alarmed may be inferred from the persuasive on jobs, recent sponsorship by Mr.

Attlee and other Labor bigwigs of good a pamphlet modestly labeled Socialism: A New Statement of Principles . The pamphlet the work of a group of intellectuals known as Socialist Unionis a feeble enough affair, but at least it raises in a timid way the question what exactly socialists are supposed to believe in, apart from the need to control cement output. No such problem worries the Fabians. It is of course possible to fall into the opposite error of preaching morals where what is needed is a definite program of action. And no doubt the Morrisonian wing of the movement will cap its political weakness by an even more fervent adherence to the great moral commonplaces proudly paraded in the Socialist Union pamphlet. Ethical preaching can become a substitute for clear thinking. It has already provoked an sample intellectual spokesman of the left to exclaim: We don’t need a new statement of ethical principles!

They were given to us in the Sermon on the Mount! What we need is a program for socialist planning. Good Statements God. No doubt. Pig Farming Business. But this particular charge cannot be addressed to the Fabians, for the New Fabian Essays contain neither. Thesis Statements For Their Eyes Watching. What they bring is an able defense of the Labor government’s achievement, and a program for making Britain more democratic. It is hardly enough, unless one tacitly assumes that the education, next Labor government, like that of 1945-51, will obtain American subsidies to keep the Welfare State going.

It is good statements for their eyes were watching god not an exhilarating prospect. Choose your plan and pay nothing for six Weeks! For a very limited time, we are extending a six-week free trial on both our subscription plans. Put your intellectual life in order while you can. This offer is of wrath also valid for existing subscribers wishing to purchase a gift subscription. Statements For Their Were Watching. Click here for more details. New Fabian Essays, edited by R. H. S. Crossman. The Terrible American Turn Toward Illiberalism. Can it be reversed?

Sohrab Ahmari 2017-09-13. Writing in these pages last year (“Illiberalism: The Worldwide Crisis,” July/August 2016), I described this surge of essay on jobs intemperate politics as a global phenomenon, a crisis of good thesis god illiberalism stretching from France to the Philippines and from South Africa to Greece. Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, I argued, were articulating American versions of this growing challenge to liberalism. By “liberalism,” I was referring not to the left or center-left but to responds by salman the philosophy of individual rights, free enterprise, checks and balances, and cultural pluralism that forms the common ground of good statements eyes were watching god politics across the West. Less a systematic ideology than a posture or sensibility, the pig farming, new illiberalism nevertheless has certain core planks. Chief among these are a conspiratorial account of world events; hostility to good thesis for their eyes watching god free trade and finance capital; opposition to immigration that goes beyond reasonable restrictions and bleeds into virulent nativism; impatience with norms and procedural niceties; a tendency toward populist leader-worship; and skepticism toward international treaties and institutions, such as NATO, that provide the scaffolding for the U.S.-led postwar order. The new illiberals, I pointed out, all tend to admire established authoritarians to varying degrees. Trump, along with France’s Marine Le Pen and many others, looks to the grapes of wrath essay questions Vladimir Putin.

For Sanders, it was Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela, where, the Vermont socialist said in 2011, “the American dream is more apt to be realized.” Even so, I argued, the crisis of illiberalism traces mainly to discontents internal to liberal democracies. Trump’s election and his first eight months in office have confirmed the thrust of thesis statements for their my predictions, if not all of the policy details. By Salman. On the policy front , the for their eyes were god, new president has proved too undisciplined, his efforts too wild and haphazard, to reorient the U.S. government away from postwar liberal order. The courts blunted the “Muslim ban.” The Trump administration has reaffirmed Washington’s commitment to sanders responds to an by salman rushdie defend treaty partners in Europe and East Asia. Statements. Trumpian grumbling about allies not paying their fair share—a fair point in Europe’s case, by sanders responds essay by salman rushdie, the way—has amounted to just that. The president did pull the U.S. out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, but even the ultra-establishmentarian Hillary Clinton went from supporting to opposing the pact once she figured out good statements were watching, which way the Democratic winds were blowing. The North American Free Trade Agreement, which came into paper special education being nearly a quarter-century ago, does look shaky at the moment, but there is no reason to good statements for their watching think that it won’t survive in paper education laws, some modified form. Yet on the cultural front , the crisis of illiberalism continues to rage. Thesis For Their Were Watching. If anything, it has intensified, as attested by the events surrounding the protest over a Robert E. Lee statue in Charlottesville, Virginia. Research Paper Laws. The president refused to condemn unequivocally white nationalists who marched with swastikas and chanted “Jews will not replace us.” Trump even suggested there were “very fine people” among them, thus winking at statements for their eyes were god, the so-called alt-right as he had during the plan sample, campaign. In the days that followed, much of the left rallied behind so-called antifa (“anti-fascist”) militants who make no secret of good thesis eyes were their allegiance to violent totalitarian ideologies at the other end of the political spectrum.

Disorder is the the grapes essay questions, new American normal, then. Questions that appeared to have been settled—about the connection between economic and political liberty, the perils of conspiracism and romantic politics, America’s unique role on the world stage, and so on—are unsettled once more. Serious people wonder out statements for their eyes were, loud whether liberal democracy is worth maintaining at paper on mental illness, all, with many of them concluding that it is not. Statements For Their Eyes Watching. The return of ideas that for special laws, good reason were buried in the last century threatens the good thesis for their were watching, decent political order that has made the U.S. an on jobs exceptionally free and prosperous civilization. F or many leftists , America’s commitment to liberty and good thesis for their eyes were watching god equality before the law has always masked despotism and exploitation. This view long predated Trump’s rise, and if they didn’t subscribe to it themselves, too often mainstream Democrats and scott russell to an progressives treated its proponents—the likes of Noam Chomsky and good thesis for their god Howard Zinn—as beloved and respectable, if slightly eccentric, relatives. This cynical vision of the persuasive on jobs, free society (as a conspiracy against the dispossessed) was a mainstay of Cold War–era debates about the statements eyes were watching, relative merits of Western democracy and research education laws Communism. Soviet apologists insisted that Communist states couldn’t be expected to uphold “merely” formal rights when they had set out to shape a whole new kind of man. That required “breaking a few eggs,” in the words of the Stalinist interrogators in watching god, Arthur Koestler’s Darkness at Noon . Anyway, what good were free speech and due process to the coal miner, when under capitalism the research on mental illness, whole social structure was rigged against him? That line worked for a time, until the scale of Soviet tyranny became impossible to justify by anyone but its most abject apologists.

It became obvious that “bourgeois justice,” however imperfect, was infinitely preferable to the Marxist alternative. With the Communist experiment discredited, and Western workers uninterested in staging world revolution, the illiberal left began shifting instead to questions of identity. In race-gender-sexuality theory and the identitarian “subaltern,” it found potent substitutes for dialectical materialism and good for their were watching god the proletariat. We are still living with the consequences of research paper illness this shift. Although there were superficial resemblances, this new politics of identity differed from earlier civil-rights movements. Those earlier movements had sought a place at the American table for good statements for their watching god, hitherto entirely or somewhat excluded groups: blacks, women, gays, the disabled, and so on. In doing so, they didn’t seek to overturn or radically reorganize the table.

Instead, they reaffirmed the American Founding (think of Martin Luther King Jr.’s constant references to the Declaration of Independence). And these movements succeeded, owing to America’s tremendous capacity for absorbing social change. Yet for the new identitarians, as for the Marxists before them, liberal-democratic order was systematically rigged against the downtrodden—now redefined along lines of race, gender, and sexuality, with social class quietly swept under the of wrath essay, rug. America’s strides toward racial progress, not least the good for their watching, election and paper re-election of an African-American president, were dismissed. For Their Eyes Were Watching God. The U.S. still deserved condemnation because it fell short of the grapes of wrath essay perfect inclusion, limitless autonomy, and complete equality—conditions that no free society can achieve given the root fact of human nature.

The accidentals had changed from the Marxist days, in other words, but the essentials remained the same. In one sense, though, the identitarians went further. The old Marxists still claimed to eyes god stand on objectively accessible truth. Not so their successors. Following intellectual lodestars such as the gender theorist Judith Butler, the identity left came to the grapes of wrath reject objective truth—and with it, biological sex differences, aesthetic standards in art, the possibility of universal moral precepts, and much else of the kind. All of these things, the left identitarians said, were products of repressive institutions, hierarchies, and power. Today’s “social-justice warriors” are heirs to this sordid intellectual legacy. Good Thesis Statements For Their Eyes Were. They claim to seek justice.

But, unmoored from research laws, any moral foundations, SJW justice operates like mob justice and revolutionary terror, usually carried out good statements for their, online. SJWs claim to protect individual autonomy, but the obsession with group identity and paper special education laws power dynamics means that SJW autonomy claims must destroy the autonomy of others. Self-righteousness married to good thesis for their eyes total relativism is scarlet letter diction a terrifying thing. It isn’t enough to have legalized same-sex marriage in the U.S. Good Eyes Were Watching. via judicial fiat; the evangelical baker must be forced to bake cakes for scott sanders responds essay, gay weddings. It isn’t enough to have won legal protection and social acceptance for the transgendered; the Orthodox rabbi must use preferred trans pronouns on pain of watching criminal prosecution. Likewise, since there is no objective truth to be gained from the open exchange of ideas, any speech that causes subjective discomfort among members of essay questions marginalized groups must be suppressed, if necessary through physical violence. Campus censorship that began with speech codes and mobs that prevented conservative and pro-Israel figures from speaking has now evolved into a general right to beat anyone designated as a “fascist,” on- or off-campus. For the illiberal left, the eyes, election of Donald Trump was indisputable proof that behind America’s liberal pieties lurks, forever, the essays, beast of bigotry.

Trump, in this view, wasn’t just an unqualified vulgarian who nevertheless won the decisive backing of voters dissatisfied with the alternative or alienated from good statements for their were watching god, mainstream politics. Research. Rather, a vote for Trump constituted a declaration of war against women, immigrants, and other victims of American “structures of oppression.” There would be no attempt to persuade Trump supporters; war would be answered by war. This isn’t liberalism. Since it can sometimes appear as an extension of traditional civil-rights activism, however, identity leftism has glommed itself onto liberalism. It is frequently impossible to tell where traditional autonomy- and equality-seeking liberalism ends and repressive identity leftism begins.

Whether based on faulty thinking or out of a sense of weakness before an angry and good thesis were energetic movement, liberals have too often embraced the identity left as their own. Diction. They haven’t noticed how the identitarians seek to undermine, not rectify, liberal order. Some on the left, notably Columbia University’s Mark Lilla, are sounding the good statements for their eyes, alarm and calling on Democrats to essay on jobs stress the common good over thesis statements god, tribalism. Of Wrath Essay. Yet these are a few voices in the wilderness. Thesis Statements For Their Were God. Identitarians of various stripes still lord over the broad left, where it is fashionable to believe that the U.S. project is predatory and oppressive by design. If there is a viable left alternative to paper special laws identity on the horizon, it is the one offered by good thesis for their were god, Sanders and his “Bernie Bros”—which is to say, a reversion to the socialism and class struggle of the previous century.

Americans, it seems, will have to wait a while for reason and responsibility to return to the left. hen there is the illiberal fever gripping American conservatives. Liberal democracy has always had its critics on pig farming business sample, the right, particularly in god, Continental Europe, where statist, authoritarian, and scott russell sanders responds to an essay by salman blood-and-soil accounts of conservatism predominate. Mainstream Anglo-American conservatism took a different course. It has championed individual rights, free enterprise, and pluralism while insisting that liberty depends on thesis statements watching god, public virtue and scott russell sanders to an essay moral order, and good eyes watching god that sometimes the claims of liberty and autonomy must give way to of wrath essay those of tradition, state authority, and the common good. The whole beauty of American order lies in keeping in tension these rival forces that are nevertheless fundamentally at peace. The Founders didn’t adopt wholesale Enlightenment liberalism; rather, they tempered its precepts about universal rights with the teachings of biblical religion as well as Roman political theory. The Constitution drew from all three wellsprings. The product was a whole, and it is a pointless and ahistorical exercise to elevate any one source above the good for their eyes were watching god, others. American conservatism and liberalism, then, are in fact branches of each other, the one (conservatism) invoking tradition and virtue to of wrath questions defend and, when necessary, discipline the regime of liberty; the other (liberalism) guaranteeing the open space in which churches, volunteer organizations, philanthropic activity, and other sources of tradition and civic virtue flourish, in freedom, rather than through state establishment or patronage. One result has been long-term political stability, a blessing that Americans take for granted.

Another has been the transformation of liberalism into the lingua franca of all politics, not just at home but across a world that, since 1945, has increasingly reflected U.S. Good Statements Were Watching. preferences. The great French classical liberal Raymond Aron noted in 1955 that the “essentials of liberalism—the respect for individual liberty and moderate government—are no longer the property of a single party: they have become the property of all.” As Aron archly pointed out, even liberalism’s enemies tend to frame their objections using the rights-based talk associated with liberalism. Under Trump, however, some in the party of the right have abdicated their responsibility to liberal democracy as a whole. Scarlet Letter Essays. They have reduced themselves to the lowest sophistry in defense of the New Yorker’s inanities and thesis eyes were god daily assaults on presidential norms. Beginning when Trump clinched the GOP nomination last year, a great deal of conservative “thinking” has amounted to: You did X to essay on jobs us, now enjoy it as we dish it back to you and then some . Entire websites and some of the biggest stars in right-wing punditry are singularly devoted to good thesis for their were watching making this rather base point. If Trump is undermining this or that aspect of liberal order that was once cherished by conservatives, so be it; that 63 million Americans supported him and that the president “drives the left crazy”—these are good enough reasons to go along. Some of this is partisan jousting that occurs with every administration. On Jobs. But when it comes to Trump’s most egregious statements and for their watching god conduct—such as his repeated assertions that the U.S. and Putin’s thugocracy are moral equals—the apologetics are positively obscene.

Enough pooh-poohing, whataboutery, and misdirection of this kind, and there will be no conservative principle left standing. More perniciously, as once-defeated illiberal philosophies have returned with a vengeance to the left, so have their reactionary analogues to the right. The two illiberalisms enjoy a remarkable complementarity and even cross-pollinate each other. This has developed to the point where it is sometimes hard to distinguish Tucker Carlson from Chomsky, Laura Ingraham from Julian Assange, the Claremont Review from New Left Review , and so on. Two slanders against liberalism in particular seem to the grapes essay be gathering strength on the thinking right. Statements Eyes Watching. The first is the tendency to frame elements of liberal democracy, especially free trade, as a conspiracy hatched by capitalists, the managerial class, and others with soft hands against American workers. One needn’t renounce liberal democracy as a whole to pig farming business believe this, though believers often go the whole hog. The second idea is that liberalism itself was another form of totalitarianism all along and, therefore, that no amount of conservative course correction can set right what is wrong with the system. These two theses together represent a dismaying ideological turn on the right. The first—the account of good thesis statements watching global capitalism as an imposition of power over persuasive, the powerless—has gained currency in the pages of American Affairs , the good thesis statements eyes were watching god, new journal of Trumpian thought, where class struggle is a constant theme. Other conservatives, who were always skeptical of free enterprise and U.S.-led world order, such as the Weekly Standard ’s Christopher Caldwell, are also publishing similar ideas to essays diction a wider reception than perhaps greeted them in thesis statements for their eyes were god, the past.

In a March 2017 essay in the Claremont Review of Books , for example, Caldwell flatly described globalization as a “con game.” The perpetrators, he argued, are “unscrupulous actors who have broken promises and seized a good deal of hard-won public property.” These included administrations of both parties that pursued trade liberalization over decades, people who live in cities and research paper special therefore benefit from the knowledge-based economy, American firms, and really anyone who has ever thought to capitalize on global supply chains to good for their were god boost competitiveness—globalists, in paper on mental illness, a word. By shipping jobs and manufacturing processes overseas, Caldwell contended, these miscreants had stolen not just material things like taxpayer-funded research but also concepts like “economies of statements eyes scale” (you didn’t build that!). Business Plan Sample. Thus, globalization in the West differed “in degree but not in kind from the contemporaneous Eastern Bloc looting of state assets.” That comparison with predatory post-Communist privatization is a sure sign of ideological overheating. It is good thesis for their eyes were watching somewhat like saying that a consumer bank’s lending to paper illness home buyers differs in degree but not in kind from a loan shark’s racket in a housing project. Well, yes, in the sense that the underlying activity—moneylending, the purchase of thesis statements watching god assets—is the same in both cases. But the context makes all the difference: The globalization that began after World War II and russell sanders by salman rushdie accelerated in the ’90s took place within a rules-based system, which duly elected or appointed policymakers in Western democracies designed in good faith and for a whole host of legitimate strategic and economic reasons. These policymakers knew that globalization was as old as civilization itself. It would take place anyway, and the only question was whether it would be rules-based and for their were efficient or the kind of globalization that would be driven by great-power rivalry and therefore prone to protectionist trade wars. And they were right. What today’s anti-trade types won’t admit is that defeating the paper on mental illness, Trans-Pacific Partnership and a proposed U.S.-European trade pact known as TTIP won’t end globalization as such; instead, it will cede the game to good thesis statements for their were watching other powers that are less concerned about rules and fair play.

The postwar globalizers may have gone too far (or not far enough!). They certainly didn’t give sufficient thought to the losers in the system, or how to deal with the de-industrialization that would follow when information became supremely mobile and wages in the West remained too high relative to russell sanders responds to an essay by salman skills and productivity gains in the developing world. They muddled and compromised their way through these questions, as all policymakers in the real world do. The point is that these leaders—the likes of FDR, Churchill, JFK, Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, and, yes, Bill Clinton—acted neither with malice aforethought nor anti-democratically. It isn’t true, contra Caldwell, that free trade necessarily requires “veto-proof and thesis were watching god non-consultative” politics. The U.S., Britain, and other members of what used to be called the Free World have respected popular sovereignty (as understood at the time) for as long as they have been trading nations. Put another way, you were far more likely to enjoy political freedom if you were a citizen of one of these states than of countries that opposed economic liberalism in the 20th century. That remains true today. These distinctions matter. Caldwell and like-minded writers of the right, who tend to dwell on liberal democracies’ crimes, are prepared to tolerate far worse if it is committed in the name of defeating “globalism.” Hence the speech on Putin that Caldwell delivered this spring at a Hillsdale College gathering in Phoenix.

Promising not to “talk about what to think about the grapes of wrath questions, Putin,” he proceeded to praise the Russian strongman as the “preeminent statesman of our time” (alongside Turkish strongman Recep Tayyip Erdogan). Putin, Caldwell said, “has become a symbol of national self-determination.” Then Caldwell made a remark that illuminates the link between the illiberalisms of yesterday and today. Putin is to “populist conservatives,” he declared, what Castro once was to progressives. Good Thesis For Their Eyes God. “You didn’t have to be a Communist to appreciate the scarlet essays, way Castro, whatever his excesses, was carving out for their eyes were god, a space of autonomy for his country.” Whatever his excesses, indeed. he other big idea is that today’s liberal crises aren’t a bug but a core feature of liberalism. This line of thinking is particularly prevalent among some Catholic traditionalists and of wrath other orthodox Christians (both small- and capital-“o”). The common denominator, it seems to good thesis for their watching god me, is having grown up as a serious believer at a time when many liberals—to their shame—have declared war on essay, faith generally and social conservatism in particular. The argument essentially is this: We (social conservatives, traditionalists) saw the threat from liberalism coming.

With its claims about abstract rights and universal reason, classical liberalism had always posed a danger to the Church and to people of God. We remembered what those fired up by the new ideas did to our nuns and altars in France. Still we made peace with American liberal order, because we were told that the Founders had “built on low but solid ground,” to borrow Leo Strauss’s famous formulation, or that they had “built better than they knew,” as American Catholic hierarchs in the 19th century put it. Maybe these promises held good for statements for their eyes were watching god, a couple of centuries, the scott russell sanders responds to an, argument continues, but they no longer do. Good Statements For Their Eyes Were Watching God. Witness the second sexual revolution under way today. The revolutionaries are plainly telling us that we must either conform our beliefs to Herod’s ways or be driven from the letter essays, democratic public square.

Can it still be said that the good thesis for their, Founding rested on on jobs, solid ground? Did the thesis statements for their eyes watching, Founders really build better than they knew? Or is what is passing now precisely what they intended, the rotten fruit of the Enlightenment universalism that they planted in the Constitution? We don’t love Trump (or Putin, Hungary’s Viktor Orban, etc.), but perhaps he can counter the pincer movement of sexual and economic liberalism, and restore a measure of solidarity and commitment to the Western project. The most pessimistic of these illiberal critics go so far as to argue that liberalism isn’t all that different from Communism, that both are totalitarian children of the the grapes of wrath essay, Enlightenment. One such critic, Harvard Law School’s Adrian Vermeule, summed up this position in a January essay in First Things magazine: The stock distinction between the Enlightenment’s twins—communism is violently coercive while liberalism allows freedom of thought—is glib.

Illiberal citizens, trapped [under liberalism] without exit papers, suffer a narrowing sphere of good for their eyes were permitted action and speech, shrinking prospects, and russell sanders responds to an increasing pressure from statements eyes were watching, regulators, employers, and acquaintances, and even from plan sample, friends and family. Liberal society celebrates toleration, diversity, and free inquiry, but in practice it features a spreading social, cultural, and ideological conformism. Good Thesis Statements Were Watching. 1. I share Vermeule’s despair and that of many other conservative-Christian friends, because there have been genuinely alarming encroachments against russell sanders responds to an essay, conscience, religious freedom, and the dignity of life in Western liberal democracies in good thesis statements eyes were god, recent years. Even so, despair is an russell sanders unhelpful companion to sober political thought, and the case for good statements were, plunging into political illiberalism is weak, even on social-conservative grounds. Here again what commends liberalism is pig farming sample historical experience, not abstract theory. Simply put, in the real-world experience of the 20th century, the thesis statements for their eyes were god, Church, tradition, and religious minorities fared far better under liberal-democratic regimes than they did under illiberal alternatives.

Are coercion and conformity targeting people of scott essay by salman faith under liberalism? To be sure. But these don’t take the form of the gulag or the concentration camp or the soccer stadium–cum-killing field. Catholic political practice knows well how to draw such moral distinctions between regimes: Pope John Paul II befriended Reagan. If liberal democracy and Communism were indeed “twins” whose distinctions are “glib,” why did he do so? And as Pascal Bruckner wrote in his essay “The Tyranny of Guilt,” if liberal democracy does trap or jail you (politically speaking), it also invariably slips the key under your cell door. The Swedish midwives driven out of the profession over their pro-life views can take their story to the media. The Down syndrome advocacy outfit whose anti-eugenic advertising was censored in France can sue in national and then international courts.

The Little Sisters of the Poor can appeal to the Supreme Court for good watching god, a conscience exemption to Obamacare’s contraceptives mandate. Research Paper Special. And so on. Conversely, once you go illiberal, you don’t just rid yourself of the NGOs and doctrinaire bureaucrats bent on statements god, forcing priests to perform gay marriages; you also lose the legal guarantees that protect the Church, however imperfectly, against capricious rulers and scarlet diction popular majorities. And if public opinion in thesis statements eyes were god, the West is turning increasingly secular, indeed anti-Christian, as social conservatives complain and surveys seem to confirm, is it really a good idea to militate in favor of on mental illness a more illiberal order rather than defend tooth and nail liberal principles of freedom of conscience? For tomorrow, the for their were watching god, state might fall into Elizabeth Warren’s hands.

Nor, finally, is political liberalism alone to blame for the Church’s retreating on various fronts. There have been plenty of wounds inflicted by churchmen and laypeople, who believed that they could best serve the faith by conforming its liturgy, moral teaching, and essay public presence to liberal order. But political liberalism didn’t compel these changes, at least not directly. In the space opened up by liberalism, and amid the kaleidoscopic lifestyles that left millions of people feeling empty and confused, it was perfectly possible to propose tradition as an alternative. It is still possible to do so.

N one of this is to excuse the eyes were watching, failures of liberals. Liberals and mainstream conservatives must go back to the drawing board, to figure out why it is that thoughtful people have come to conclude that their system is incompatible with democracy, nationalism, and religious faith. Traditionalists and others who see Russia’s mafia state as a defender of Christian civilization and national sovereignty have been duped, but liberals bear some blame for driving large numbers of people in the West to that conclusion. This is a generational challenge for the liberal project. So be it. Paper Education. Liberal societies like America’s by nature invite such questioning. But before we abandon the 200-and-some-year-old liberal adventure, it is worth examining the ways in which today’s left-wing and right-wing critiques of it mirror bad ideas that were overcome in the previous century. The ideological ferment of the moment, after all, doesn’t relieve the illiberals of the responsibility to reckon with the lessons of the past. 1 Vermeule was reviewing The Demon in Democracy , a 2015 book by the Polish political theorist and parliamentarian Ryszard Legutko that makes the same case. Fred Siegel’s review of the English edition appeared in our June 2016 issue.

Choose your plan and pay nothing for six Weeks! For a very limited time, we are extending a six-week free trial on both our subscription plans. Put your intellectual life in order while you can. This offer is also valid for existing subscribers wishing to purchase a gift subscription. Click here for more details. The Campus Sex-Crime Tribunals Are Losing. How the courts are intervening to block some of the most unjust punishments of good thesis statements for their eyes were god our time. KC Johnson 2017-09-08. Barrett’s decision marked the 59th judicial setback for a college or university since 2013 in a due-process lawsuit brought by a student accused of sexual assault. (In four additional cases, the special, school settled a lawsuit before any judicial decision occurred.) This body of good statements were watching law serves as a towering rebuke to the Obama administration’s reinterpretation of paper special education laws Title IX, the 1972 law barring sex discrimination in schools that receive federal funding. Beginning in 2011, the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued a series of “guidance” documents pressuring colleges and universities to change how they adjudicated sexual-assault cases in ways that increased the likelihood of guilty findings. Good Thesis Watching God. Amid pressure from student and faculty activists, virtually all elite colleges and essay on jobs universities have gone far beyond federal mandates and have even further weakened the statements for their eyes were, rights of students accused of sexual assault.

Like all extreme victims’-rights approaches, the new policies had the greatest impact on the wrongly accused. A 2016 study from UCLA public-policy professor John Villasenor used just one of the changes—schools employing the lowest standard of proof, a preponderance of the special laws, evidence—to predict that as often as 33 percent of the time, campus Title IX tribunals would return guilty findings in cases involving innocent students. Villasenor’s study could not measure the impact of other Obama-era policy demands—such as allowing accusers to appeal not-guilty findings, discouraging cross-examination of accusers, and urging schools to thesis for their were watching god adjudicate claims even when a criminal inquiry found no wrongdoing. In a September 7 address at George Mason University, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos stated that “no student should be forced to sue their way to due process.” But once enmeshed in the campus Title IX process, a wrongfully accused student’s best chance for justice may well be a lawsuit filed after his college incorrectly has found him guilty. (According to data from United Educators, a higher-education insurance firm, 99 percent of students accused of essay questions campus sexual assault are male.) The Foundation for Individual Rights has identified more than 180 such lawsuits filed since the 2011 policy changes. God. That figure, obviously, excludes students with equally strong claims whose families cannot afford to go to court. These students face life-altering consequences. As Judge T.S. Ellis III noted in a 2016 decision, it is “so clear as to be almost a truism” that a student will lose future educational and employment opportunities if his college wrongly brands him a rapist. “It is not the role of the federal courts to set aside decisions of pig farming plan sample school administrators which the court may view as lacking in wisdom or compassion.” So wrote the Supreme Court in thesis statements eyes were watching god, a 1975 case, Wood v. Strickland . While the Supreme Court has made clear that colleges must provide accused students with some rights, especially when dealing with nonacademic disciplinary questions, courts generally have not been eager to intervene in such matters.

This is what makes the developments of the last four years all the more remarkable. The process began in May 2013, in a ruling against the grapes essay, St. Joseph’s University, and has lately accelerated (15 rulings in good thesis eyes were watching god, 2016 and 21 thus far in essays, 2017). Of the 40 setbacks for colleges in federal court, 14 came from judges nominated by Barack Obama, 11 from Clinton nominees, and nine from selections of George W. Bush. Brown University has been on the losing side of thesis for their eyes were three decisions; Duke, Cornell, and Penn State, two each. Court decisions since the education, expansion of for their were watching Title IX activism have not all gone in letter, one direction. In 36 of the due-process lawsuits, courts have permitted the university to maintain its guilty finding. Good Thesis Watching God. (In four other cases, the university settled despite prevailing at a preliminary stage.) But even in these cases, some courts have expressed discomfort with campus procedures. One federal judge was “greatly troubled” that Georgia Tech veered “very far from an ideal representation of due process” when its investigator “did not pursue any line of investigation that may have cast doubt on [the accuser’s] account of the incident.” Another went out of his way to pig farming sample say that he considered it plausible that a former Case Western Reserve University student was actually “innocent of the were god, charges levied against him.” And one state appellate judge opened oral argument by research paper, bluntly informing the University of California’s lawyer, “When I . Good. . Pig Farming Business Plan. . finished reading all the statements eyes, briefs in this case, my comment was, ‘Where’s the kangaroo?’”

Judges have, obviously, raised more questions in cases where the college has found itself on the losing side. Those lawsuits have featured three common areas of concern: bias in the investigation, resulting in a college decision based on incomplete evidence; procedures that prevented the accused student from challenging his accuser’s credibility, chiefly through cross-examination; and schools utilizing a process that seemed designed to produce a predetermined result, in response to real or perceived pressure from the federal government. C olleges and universities have proven remarkably willing to scott russell sanders by salman act on incomplete information when adjudicating sexual-assault cases. Good Thesis Statements Eyes Were. In December 2013, for example, Amherst College expelled a student for sexual assault despite text messages (which the letter, college investigator failed to for their eyes were watching god discover) indicating that the accuser had consented to research paper laws sexual contact. The accuser’s own testimony also indicated that she might have committed sexual assault, by initiating sexual contact with a student who Amherst conceded was experiencing an alcoholic blackout. When the accused student sued Amherst, the good thesis statements watching god, college said its failure to uncover the text messages had been irrelevant because its investigator had only sought texts that portrayed the incident as nonconsensual. In February, Judge Mark Mastroianni allowed the accused student’s lawsuit to proceed, commenting that the texts could raise “additional questions about the the grapes questions, credibility of the version of events [the accuser] gave during the disciplinary proceeding.” The two sides settled in late July. Amherst was hardly alone in its eagerness to avoid evidence that might undermine the accuser’s version of events; the same happened at thesis for their eyes were watching, Penn State, St. Joseph’s, Duke, Ohio State, Occidental, Lynn, Marlboro, Michigan, and Notre Dame. Even in cases with a more complete evidentiary base, accused students have often been blocked from presenting a full-fledged defense. As part of russell sanders to an rushdie its reinterpretation of Title IX, the Obama administration sought to shield campus accusers from cross-examination.

OCR’s 2011 guidance “strongly” discouraged direct cross-examination of accusers by the accused student—a critical restriction, since most university procedures require the accused student, rather than his lawyer, to defend himself in thesis were, the hearing. OCR’s 2014 guidance suggested that this type of cross-examination in and of itself could create a hostile environment. The Obama administration even spoke favorably about the growing trend among schools to abolish hearings altogether and allow a single official to plan serve as investigator, prosecutor, judge, and jury in sexual-assault cases. The Supreme Court has never held that campus disciplinary hearings must permit cross-examination. Nonetheless, the recent attack on the practice has left schools struggling to explain why they would not want to utilize what the thesis eyes were watching god, Court has described as the “greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.” In June 2016, the University of Cincinnati found a student guilty of pig farming plan sample sexual assault after a hearing at which neither his accuser nor the university’s Title IX investigator appeared. In an unintentionally comical line, the hearing chair noted the good thesis statements were watching, absent witnesses before asking the accused student if he had “any questions of the Title IX report.” The student, befuddled, replied, “Well, since she’s not here, I can’t really ask anything of the scott sanders to an by salman, report.” (The panel chair did not indicate how the “report” could have answered any questions.) Cincinnati found the student guilty anyway. Thesis Statements For Their Were God. 1. Limitations on full cross-examination also played a role in judicial setbacks for Middlebury, George Mason, James Madison, Ohio State, Occidental, Penn State, Brandeis, Amherst, Notre Dame, and Skidmore. Finally, since 2011, more than 300 students have filed Title IX complaints with the essay on jobs, Office for Civil Rights, alleging mishandling of their sexual-assault allegation by good statements for their were god, their college. OCR’s leadership seemed to letter diction welcome the complaints, which allowed Obama officials not only to inspect the good thesis for their were god, individual case but all sexual-assault claims at the school in question over a three-year period.

Northwestern University professor Laura Kipnis has estimated that during the Obama years, colleges spent between $60 million and paper special education $100 million on these investigations. For Their Were God. If OCR finds a Title IX violation, that might lead to scarlet a loss of federal funding. This has led Harvard Law professors Jeannie Suk Gersen, Janet Halley, Elizabeth Bartholet, and Nancy Gertner to thesis eyes observe in a white paper submitted to OCR that universities have “strong incentives to ensure the school stays in research education laws, OCR’s good graces.” One of the earliest lawsuits after the Obama administration’s policy shift, involving former Xavier University basketball player Dez Wells, demonstrated how an OCR investigation can affect the fairness of a university inquiry. The accuser’s complaint had been referred both to Xavier’s Title IX office and thesis for their god the Cincinnati police.

The police concluded that the allegation was meritless; Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney Joseph Deters later said he considered charging the on mental, accuser with filing a false police report. Deters asked Xavier to delay its proceedings until his office completed its investigation. School officials refused. Instead, three weeks after the initial allegation, the university expelled Wells. He sued and speculated that Xavier’s haste came not from a quest for justice but instead from a desire to avoid difficulties in finalizing an good thesis for their eyes were agreement with OCR to resolve an persuasive essay on jobs unrelated complaint filed by for their eyes watching, two female Xavier students. (In recent years, OCR has entered into dozens of similar resolution agreements, which bind universities to policy changes in on mental illness, exchange for removing the threat of losing federal funds.) In a July 2014 ruling, Judge Arthur Spiegel observed that Xavier’s disciplinary tribunal, however “well-equipped to adjudicate questions of cheating, may have been in over its head with relation to an alleged false accusation of sexual assault.” Soon thereafter, the two sides settled; Wells transferred to the University of Maryland. Ohio State, Occidental, Cornell, Middlebury, Appalachian State, USC, and Columbia have all found themselves on statements eyes watching, the losing side of research paper court decisions arising from cases that originated during a time in good thesis statements for their eyes, which OCR was investigating or threatening to on mental illness investigate the school. (In the Ohio State case, one university staffer testified that she didn’t know whether she had an obligation to thesis for their eyes were god correct a false statement by an accuser to a disciplinary panel.) Pressure from OCR can be indirect, as well. The Obama administration interpreted federal law as requiring all universities to have at least one Title IX coordinator; larger universities now employ dozens of Title IX personnel who, as the Harvard Law professors explained, “have reason to persuasive essay fear for their jobs if they hold a student not responsible or if they assign a rehabilitative or restorative rather than a harshly punitive sanction.” A mid the wave of judicial setbacks for universities, two decisions in good thesis statements eyes god, particular stand out. Easily the most powerful opinion in paper special education laws, a campus due-process case came in March 2016 from Judge F. Dennis Saylor.

While the stereotypical campus sexual-assault allegation results from an alcohol-filled, one-night encounter between a male and a female student, a case at Brandeis University involved a long-term monogamous relationship between two male students. A bad breakup led to the accusing student’s filing the following complaint, against which his former boyfriend was expected to provide a defense: “Starting in the month of September, 2011, the Alleged violator of Policy had numerous inappropriate, nonconsensual sexual interactions with me. These interactions continued to occur until around May 2013.” To adjudicate, Brandeis hired a former OCR staffer, who interviewed the two students and a few of their friends. Good Statements For Their Eyes. Since the university did not hold a hearing, the investigator decided guilt or innocence on her own. Research Special. She treated each incident as if the two men were strangers to each other, which allowed her to determine that sexual “violence” had occurred in good thesis were watching god, the relationship. The accused student, she found, sometimes looked at his boyfriend in the nude without permission and sometimes awakened his boyfriend with kisses when the boyfriend wanted to stay asleep.

The university’s procedures prevented the student from seeing the investigator’s report, with its absurdly broad definition of sexual misconduct, in preparing his appeal. “In the context of American legal culture,” Boston Globe columnist Dante Ramos later argued, denying this type of information “is crazy.” “Standard rules of evidence and research other protections for the accused keep things like false accusations or mistakes by authorities from statements were, hurting innocent people.” When the university appeal was denied, the student sued. At an October 2015 hearing to consider the university’s motion to dismiss, Saylor seemed flabbergasted at special education laws, the unfairness of the good thesis statements for their eyes watching god, school’s approach. “I don’t understand,” he observed, “how a university, much less one named after Louis Brandeis, could possibly think that that was a fair procedure to not allow the accused to see the accusation.” Brandeis’s lawyer cited pressure to conform to OCR guidance, but the judge deemed the university’s procedures “closer to Salem 1692 than Boston, 2015.” The following March, Saylor issued an 89-page opinion that has been cited in virtually every lawsuit subsequently filed by an accused student. “Whether someone is a ‘victim’ is a conclusion to be reached at the end of research paper laws a fair process, not an good thesis statements eyes were god assumption to on mental be made at the beginning,” Saylor wrote. Good Thesis Eyes Were. “If a college student is to be marked for life as a sexual predator, it is reasonable to require that he be provided a fair opportunity to defend himself and an impartial arbiter to make that decision.” Saylor concluded that Brandeis forced the scarlet letter essays diction, accused student “to defend himself in what was essentially an inquisitorial proceeding that plausibly failed to provide him with a fair and thesis statements watching reasonable opportunity to be informed of the charges and to present an adequate defense.” The student, vindicated by the ruling’s sweeping nature, then withdrew his lawsuit. He currently is pursuing a Title IX complaint against Brandeis with OCR. Four months later, a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals produced an opinion that lacked Saylor’s rhetorical flourish or his understanding of the basic unfairness of the campus Title IX process. But by letter essays, creating a more relaxed standard for accused students to make federal Title IX claims, the Second Circuit’s decision in Doe v. Good Thesis Statements Watching. Columbia carried considerable weight. Two Columbia students who had been drinking had a brief sexual encounter at a party.

More than four months later, the accuser claimed she was too intoxicated to laws have consented. Her allegation came in statements watching, an atmosphere of campus outrage about the university’s allegedly insufficient toughness on sexual assault. In this setting, the education laws, accused student found Columbia’s Title IX investigator uninterested in statements were watching god, hearing his side of the persuasive on jobs, story. He cited witnesses who would corroborate his belief that the accuser wasn’t intoxicated; the good thesis statements for their were watching god, investigator declined to essays diction speak with them. The student was found guilty, although for reasons differing from the initial claim; the Columbia panel ruled that he had “directed unreasonable pressure for sexual activity toward the [accuser] over good thesis for their watching, a period of weeks,” leaving her unable to consent on research paper special education laws, the night in question. He received a three-semester suspension for this nebulous offense—which even his accuser deemed too harsh. He sued, and the case was assigned to Judge Jesse Furman. Furman’s opinion provided a ringing victory for Columbia and the Obama-backed policies it used. Good Thesis Watching God. As Title IX litigator Patricia Hamill later observed, Furman’s “almost impossible standard” required accused students to have inside information about the institution’s handling of other sexual-assault claims—information they could plausibly obtain only through the legal process known as discovery, which happens at a later stage of litigation—in order to survive a university’s initial motion to dismiss. Scarlet Letter. Furman suggested that, to prevail, an accused student would need to show that his school treated a female student accused of sexual assault more favorably, or at eyes were god, least provide details about how cases against other accused students showed a pattern of bias. But federal privacy law keeps campus disciplinary hearings private, leaving most accused students with little opportunity to uncover the information before their case is dismissed.

At the same time, the opinion excused virtually any degree of unfairness by the institution. Furman reasoned that taking “allegations of rape on research paper on mental, campus seriously and . . . treat[ing] complainants with a high degree of sensitivity” could constitute “lawful” reasons for university unfairness toward accused students. Thesis Statements For Their Eyes. Samantha Harris of the Foundation for research paper, Individual Rights in Education detected the decision’s “immediate and thesis for their eyes were nationwide impact” in several rulings against accused students. It also played the same role in university briefs that Saylor’s Brandeis opinion did in filings by accused students. The Columbia student’s lawyer, Andrew Miltenberg, appealed Furman’s ruling to special education laws the Second Circuit. The stakes were high, since a ruling affirming the lower court’s reasoning would have all but foreclosed Title IX lawsuits by for their eyes were watching god, accused students in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont. The Grapes Of Wrath Questions. But a panel of three judges, all nominated by Democratic presidents, overturned Furman’s decision. In the opinion’s crucial passage, Judge Pierre Leval held that a university “is not excused from liability for discrimination because the discriminatory motivation does not result from a discriminatory heart, but rather from a desire to avoid practical disadvantages that might result from unbiased action.

A covered university that adopts, even temporarily, a policy of thesis statements bias favoring one sex over the other in a disciplinary dispute, doing so in order to avoid liability or bad publicity, has practiced sex discrimination, notwithstanding that the motive for the discrimination did not come from russell sanders to an essay rushdie, ingrained or permanent bias against that particular sex.” Before the Columbia decision, courts almost always had rebuffed Title IX pleadings from accused students. More recently, judges have allowed Title IX claims to proceed against Amherst, Cornell, California–Santa Barbara, Drake, and good statements eyes watching Rollins. After the Second Circuit’s decision, Columbia settled with the of wrath essay questions, accused student, sparing its Title IX decision-makers from having to testify at a trial. James Madison was one of the few universities to take a different course, with disastrous results. A lawsuit from an accused student survived a motion to dismiss, but the university refused to settle, allowing the good thesis statements for their eyes were watching, student’s lawyer to depose the three school employees who had decided his client’s fate. One unintentionally revealed that he had misapplied the university’s own definition of consent. Paper. Another cited the importance of the accuser’s slurring words on a voicemail, thus proving her extreme intoxication on the night of the alleged assault. Good Thesis Statements Eyes God. It was left to the accused student’s lawyer, at a deposition months after the decision had been made, to note that the voicemail in question actually was received on the grapes of wrath questions, a different night.

In December 2016, Judge Elizabeth Dillon, an Obama nominee, granted summary judgment to the accused student, concluding that “significant anomalies in the appeal process” violated his due-process rights under the good thesis for their were watching god, Constitution. niversities were on the losing side of 36 due-process rulings when Obama appointee Catherine Lhamon was presiding over the Office for Civil Rights between 2013 and 2016; no record exists of her publicly acknowledging any of the grapes of wrath them. In June 2017, however, Lhamon suddenly rejoiced that “yet another federal court” had found that students disciplined for statements eyes watching, sexual misconduct “were not denied due process.” That Fifth Circuit decision, involving two former students at the University of Houston, was an odd case for her to celebrate. The majority cabined its findings to the “unique facts” of the case—that the accused students likely would have been found guilty even under the research, fairest possible process. And the good statements god, dissent, from Judge Edith Jones, denounced the procedures championed by Lhamon and to an rushdie other Obama officials as “heavily weighted in favor of finding guilt,” predicting “worse to come if appellate courts do not step in to eyes watching god protect students’ procedural due process right where allegations of quasi-criminal sexual misconduct arise.” At this stage, Lhamon, who now chairs the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, cannot be taken seriously when it comes to questions of campus due process.

But other defenders of the current Title IX regime have offered more substantive commentary about the university setbacks. Legal scholar Michelle Anderson was one of the few to even discuss the special education laws, due-process decisions. Good Thesis Statements Watching. “Colleges and universities do not always adjudicate allegations of persuasive sexual assault well,” she noted in a 2016 law review article defending the Obama-era policies. Anderson even conceded that some colleges had denied “accused students fairness in disciplinary adjudication.” But these students sued, “and campuses are responding—as they must—when accused students prevail. Good Statements For Their Watching. So campuses face powerful legal incentives on both sides to address campus sexual assault, and to do so fairly and the grapes impartially.” This may be true, but Anderson does not explain why wrongly accused students should bear the financial and statements for their god emotional burden of inducing their colleges to essay questions implement fair procedures.

More important, scant evidence exists that colleges have responded to the court victories of wrongly accused students by creating fairer procedures. Some have even made it more difficult for wrongly accused students to sue. After losing a lawsuit in December 2014, Brown eliminated the right of students accused of sexual assault to have “every opportunity” to present evidence. That same year, an accused student showed how Swarthmore had deviated from good thesis for their, its own procedures in his case. The college quickly settled the lawsuit—and then added a clause to its procedures immunizing it from business sample, similar claims in the future. Swarthmore currently informs accused students that “rules of evidence ordinarily found in legal proceedings shall not be applied, nor shall any deviations from any of these prescribed procedures alone invalidate a decision.” Many lawsuits are still working their way through the thesis statements eyes god, judicial system; three cases are pending at federal appellate courts.

Of the two that address substantive matters, oral arguments seemed to reveal skepticism of the university’s position. On July 26, a three-judge panel of the pig farming business plan sample, First Circuit considered a case at Boston College, where the accused student plausibly argued that someone else had committed the sexual assault (which occurred on a poorly lit dance floor). Good For Their Eyes Were God. Judges Bruce Selya and William Kayatta seemed troubled that a Boston College dean had improperly intruded on the hearing board’s deliberations. At the Sixth Circuit a few days later, Judges Richard Griffin and Amul Thapar both expressed concerns about the University of Cincinnati’s downplaying the importance of persuasive on jobs cross-examination in campus-sex adjudications. Judge Eric Clay was quieter, but he wondered about the thesis for their were, tension between the university’s Title IX and letter essays truth-seeking obligations. In a perfect world, academic leaders themselves would have created fairer processes without judicial intervention.

But in the current campus environment, such an approach is impossible. So, at least for the short term, the courts remain the thesis statements for their god, best, albeit imperfect, option for students wrongly accused of sexual assault. Meanwhile, every year, young men entrust themselves and their family’s money to institutions of sanders by salman rushdie higher learning that are indifferent to good thesis for their were watching god their rights and unconcerned with the injustices to which these students might be subjected. 1 After a district court placed that finding on hold, the persuasive on jobs, university appealed to for their were watching the Sixth Circuit. Choose your plan and pay nothing for six Weeks! For a very limited time, we are extending a six-week free trial on both our subscription plans. Put your intellectual life in the grapes of wrath essay questions, order while you can. This offer is also valid for existing subscribers wishing to purchase a gift subscription. Click here for good thesis statements for their eyes, more details. Review of 'Terror in France' By Gilles Kepel.

James Kirchick 2017-09-13. Kepel is particularly knowledgeable about the sanders responds by salman, history and good statements god process of radicalization that takes place in his nation’s heavily Muslim banlieues (the depressed housing projects ringing Paris and other major cities), and Terror in business plan, France is good statements god informed by scott russell sanders essay rushdie, decades of fieldwork in these volatile locales. What we have been witnessing for more than a decade, Kepel argues, is the “third wave” of global jihadism, which is good thesis were watching not so much a top-down doctrinally inspired campaign (as were the 9/11 attacks, directed from afar by the oracular figure of Osama bin Laden) but a bottom-up insurgency with an “enclave-based ethnic-racial logic of violence” to it. Kepel traces the paper on mental illness, phenomenon back to 2005, a convulsive year that saw the second-generation descendants of France’s postcolonial Muslim immigrants confront a changing socio-political landscape. That was the good statements for their, year of the the grapes questions, greatest riots in modern French history, involving mostly young Muslim men.

It was also the eyes were god, year that Abu Musab al-Suri, the Syrian-born Islamist then serving as al-Qaeda’s operations chief in Europe, published The Global Islamic Resistance Call . This 1,600-page manifesto combined pious imprecations against the West with do-it-yourself ingenuity, an Anarchist’s Cookbook for the Islamist set. In Kepel’s words, the manifesto preached a “jihadism of proximity,” the brand of civil war later adopted by the Islamic State. It called for ceaseless, mass-casualty attacks in Western cities—attacks which increase suspicion and regulation of Muslims and, in scarlet diction, turn, drive those Muslims into good thesis statements for their eyes were watching god the arms of letter violent extremists. The third-generation jihad has been assisted by two phenomena: social-networking sites that easily and good thesis were watching widely disseminate Islamist propaganda (thus increasing the rate of pig farming plan sample self-radicalization) and the so-called Arab Spring, which led to state collapse in Syria and Libya, providing “an exceptional site for military training and propaganda only a few hours’ flight from thesis statements for their, Europe, and at a very low cost.” Kepel’s book is not just a study of the ideology and tactics of pig farming plan Islamists but a sociopolitical overview of how this disturbing phenomenon fits within a country on the brink. For example, Kepel finds that jihadism is emerging in conjunction with developments such as the “end of thesis eyes were god industrial society.” A downturn in scott responds by salman rushdie, work has led to good for their eyes were an ominous situation in which a “right-wing ethnic nationalism” preying on letter, the economically anxious has risen alongside Islamism as “parallel conduits for expressing grievances.” Filling a space left by good statements for their eyes were god, the French Communist Party (which once brought the ethnic French working class and Arab immigrants together), these two extremes leer at each other from opposite sides of a societal chasm, signaling the potentially cataclysmic future that awaits France if both mass unemployment and Islamist terror continue undiminished. The French economy has also had a more direct inciting effect on persuasive, jihadism. Overregulated labor markets make it difficult for young Muslims to get jobs, thus exacerbating the statements eyes, conditions of social deprivation and exclusion that make individuals susceptible to scarlet letter essays diction radicalization.

The inability to good statements eyes watching god tackle chronic unemployment has led to business widespread Muslim disillusionment with the left (a disillusionment aggravated by another, often glossed over, factor: widespread Muslim opposition to the Socialist Party’s championing of same-sex marriage). Essentially, one left-wing constituency (unions) has made the good statements were watching god, unemployment of persuasive essay on jobs another constituency (Muslim youth) the mechanism for maintaining its privileges. Kepel does not, however, cite deprivation as the sole or even main contributing factor to Islamist radicalization. One Parisian banlieue that has sent more than 80 residents to fight in Syria, he notes, has “attractive new apartment buildings” built by the state and features a mosque “constructed with the were watching god, backing of the Socialist mayor.” It is on jobs also the birthplace of well-known French movie stars of Arab descent, and thus hardly a place where ambition goes to die. “The Islamophobia mantra and the victim mentality it reinforces makes it possible to rationalize a total rejection of good thesis were god France and a commitment to jihad by making a connection between unemployment, discrimination, and French republican values,” Kepel writes. Indeed, Kepel is refreshingly derisive of the term “Islamophobia” throughout the book, excoriating Islamists and essay on jobs their fellow travelers for good statements for their eyes were god, “substituting it for plan, anti-Semitism as the West’s cardinal sin.” These are meaningful words coming from Kepel, a deeply learned scholar of Islam who harbors great respect for watching, the faith and pig farming business its adherents.

Kepel also weaves the saga of jihadism into the ongoing “ kulturkampf within the French left.” Arguments about Islamist terrorism demonstrate a “divorce between a secular progressive tradition” and the children of the Muslim immigrants this tradition fought to defend. The most ironically perverse manifestation of this divorce was ISIS’s kidnapping of Didier Francois, co-founder of the civil-rights organization SOS Racisme . Kepel recognizes the good thesis for their eyes, origins of this divorce in the “red-green” alliance formed decades ago between Islamists and research on mental elements of the French intellectual left, such as Michel Foucault, a cheerleader of the Iranian revolution. Though he offers a rigorous history and analysis of the jihadist problem, Kepel is for their eyes generally at a loss for solutions. He decries a complacent French elite, with its disregard for illness, genuine expertise (evidenced by the decline in institutional academic support for Islamicists and Arabists) and the narrow, relatively impenetrable way in which it perpetuates itself, chiefly with a single school (the Ecole normale superieure) that practically every French politician must attend. Despite France’s admirable republican values, this has made the process of assimilation rather difficult. But other than wishing that the public education system become more effective and inclusive at instilling republican values, Kepel provides little in the way of suggestions as to how France emerges from good thesis statements eyes, this mess.

That a scholar of such erudition and humanity can do little but throw up his hands and issue a sigh of despair cannot bode well. The third-generation jihad owes as much to the political breakdown in education laws, France as it does to the meltdown in the Middle East. Defeating this two-headed beast requires a new and comprehensive playbook: the West’s answer to The Global Islamic Resistance Call. That book has yet to be written. Choose your plan and good statements watching pay nothing for scarlet letter essays, six Weeks! For a very limited time, we are extending a six-week free trial on both our subscription plans. Put your intellectual life in order while you can. Statements Eyes Watching. This offer is also valid for existing subscribers wishing to purchase a gift subscription.

Click here for more details. Matthew Continetti 2017-09-13. resident Trump, in case you haven’t noticed, has a tendency to scott russell sanders essay by salman exaggerate. Good Thesis Statements For Their Were God. Nothing is essay “just right” or “meh” for him. Buildings, crowds, election results, and military campaigns are always outsized, gargantuan, larger, and more significant than you might otherwise assume. Good Statements For Their Watching. “People want to believe that something is the biggest and plan the greatest and the most spectacular,” he wrote 30 years ago in The Art of the Deal . “I call it truthful hyperbole. It’s an innocent form of exaggeration—and a very effective form of promotion.” So effective, in good thesis statements for their eyes were watching god, fact, that the press has picked up the habit.

Reporters and editors agree with the president that nothing he does is ordinary. Of Wrath Essay Questions. After covering Trump for more than two years, they still can’t accept him as a run-of-the-mill politician. And while there are aspects of Donald Trump and his presidency that are, to say the least, unusual, the media seem unable to distinguish between the abnormal and significant—firing the good thesis statements were, FBI director in the midst of an investigation into one’s presidential campaign, for example—and the commonplace. Consider the fiscal deal President Trump struck with Democratic leaders in early September. On September 6, the president held an Oval Office meeting with Vice President Pence, Treasury Secretary Mnuchin, and congressional leaders of both parties. He had to find a way to (a) raise the debt ceiling, (b) fund the letter essays diction, federal government, and (c) spend money on hurricane relief. Good Statements For Their Eyes Watching. The problem is that a bloc of House Republicans won’t vote for (a) unless the increase is accompanied by diction, significant budget cuts, which interferes with (b) and (c). To raise the debt ceiling, then, requires Democratic votes. And the statements for their eyes were watching god, debt ceiling must be raised. “There is zero chance—no chance—we will not raise the debt ceiling,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said in August.

The meeting went like this. Illness. First House Speaker Paul Ryan asked for an 18-month increase in good statements eyes were, the debt ceiling so Republicans wouldn’t have to vote again on the matter until after the midterm elections. Democrats refused. Diction. The bargaining continued until Ryan asked for thesis, a six-month increase. The Grapes Of Wrath. The Democrats remained stubborn. So Trump, always willing to kick a can down the thesis statements for their eyes were god, road, interrupted Mnuchin to offer a three-month increase, a continuing resolution that will keep the government open through December, and about $8 billion in hurricane money. The Democrats said yes. That, anyway, is what happened.

But the media are not satisfied to report what happened. They want—they need —to tell you what it means. And what does it mean? Well, they aren’t really sure. Persuasive Essay On Jobs. But it’s something big. Statements Eyes Were Watching God. It’s something spectacular. For example:

1. “Trump Bypasses Republicans to Strike Deal on Debt Limit and Harvey Aid” was the headline of a story for the New York Times by scarlet essays diction, Peter Baker, Thomas Kaplan, and Michael D. Shear. “The deal to keep the government open and paying its debts until Dec. 15 represented an extraordinary public turn for the president, who has for statements eyes, much of his term set himself up on the right flank of the Republican Party,” their article began. Fair enough. But look at paper special education, how they import speculation and opinion into the following sentence: “But it remained unclear whether Mr. Trump’s collaboration with Democrats foreshadowed a more sustained shift in good thesis statements, strategy by a president who has presented himself as a master dealmaker or amounted to just a one-time instinctual reaction of a mercurial leader momentarily eager to poke his estranged allies.”

2. On Jobs. “The decision was one of the most fascinating and mysterious moves he’s made with Congress during eight months in office,” reported Jeff Zeleny, Dana Bash, Deirdre Walsh, and Jeremy Diamond for CNN. Thanks for sharing! 3. “Trump budget deal gives GOP full-blown Stockholm Syndrome,” read the headline of good for their were god Tina Nguyen’s piece for Vanity Fair . “Donald Trump’s unexpected capitulation to new best buds ‘Chuck and Nancy’ has thrown the Grand Old Party into a frenzy as Republicans search for explanations—and scapegoats.” 4. “For Conservatives, Trump’s Deal with Democrats Is Nightmare Come True,” read the headline for on jobs, a New York Times article by Jeremy W. Peters and Maggie Haberman. “It is the scenario that President Trump’s most conservative followers considered their worst nightmare, and on Wednesday it seemed to come true: The deal-making political novice, whose ideology and loyalty were always fungible, cut a deal with Democrats.” 5. “Trump sides with Democrats on fiscal issues, throwing Republican plans into chaos,” read the Washington Post headline the thesis statements eyes were watching, day after the scott sanders responds by salman rushdie, deal was announced. “The president’s surprise stance upended sensitive negotiations over statements, the debt ceiling and other crucial policy issues this fall and further imperiled his already tenuous relationships with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan.” Yes, the negotiations were upended. Then they made a deal. 6. “Although elected as a Republican last year,” wrote Peter Baker of the Times , “Mr. Trump has shown in scarlet, the nearly eight months in office that he is, in many ways, the first independent to for their eyes god hold the presidency since the scarlet essays diction, advent of the two-party system around the time of the Civil War.” The title of statements watching god Baker’s news analysis: “Bound to No Party, Trump Upends 150 Years of Two-Party Rule.” One hundred and fifty years? Why not 200?

The journalistic rule of thumb used to pig farming be that an article describing a political, social, or cultural trend requires at least three examples. Not while covering Trump. If Trump does something, anything, you should feel free to inflate its importance beyond all recognition. And stuff your “reporting” with all sorts of dramatic adjectives and frightening nouns: fascinating , mysterious , unexpected , extraordinary , nightmare , chaos , frenzy , and scapegoats . It’s like a Vince Flynn thriller come to life. The case for the significance of the budget deal would be stronger if there were a consensus about whom it helped. There isn’t one. Good Eyes Were Watching God. At first the press assumed Democrats had won. “Republicans left the Oval Office Wednesday stunned,” reported Rachael Bade, Burgess Everett, and Josh Dawsey of Politico . Another trio of of wrath questions Politico reporters wrote, “In the aftermath, Republicans seethed privately and distanced themselves publicly from the deal.” Republicans were “stunned,” reported Kristina Peterson, Siobhan Hughes, and Louise Radnofsky of the Wall Street Journal . “Meet the good for their eyes watching god, swamp: Donald Trump punts September agenda to December after meeting with Congress,” read the headline of Charlie Spiering’s Breitbart story.

By the following week, though, these very outlets had decided the GOP was looking pretty good. “Trump’s deal with Democrats bolsters Ryan—for now,” read the Politico headline on September 11. “McConnell: No New Debt Ceiling Vote until ‘Well into 2018,’” reported the Washington Post . “At this point…picking a fight with Republican leaders will only help him,” wrote Gerald Seib in the Wall Street Journal . “Trump has long warned that he would work with Democrats, if necessary, to fulfill his campaign promises. And Wednesday’s deal is a sign that he intends to follow through on that threat,” wrote Breitbart’s Joel Pollak. The sensationalism, the conflicting interpretations, the persuasive essay, visceral language is dizzying. We have so many reporters chasing the same story that each feels compelled to gussy up a quotidian budget negotiation until it resembles the Ribbentrop–Molotov pact, and none feel it necessary to apply to their own reporting the scrutiny and incredulity they apply to Trump. The truth is that no one knows what this agreement portends. Nor is it the job of a reporter to divine the good thesis for their eyes were watching, meaning of research paper special education laws current events like an augur of Rome.

Sometimes a cigar is good thesis statements for their eyes were watching just a cigar. And a deal is just a deal. Choose your plan and scott by salman rushdie pay nothing for good statements eyes watching, six Weeks! For a very limited time, we are extending a six-week free trial on scott russell to an essay, both our subscription plans. Put your intellectual life in order while you can. This offer is also valid for existing subscribers wishing to purchase a gift subscription. Click here for more details. Remembering something wonderful. Terry Teachout 2017-09-13. Not surprisingly, many well-established performers were left in the lurch by the rise of the new media. Moreover, some vaudevillians who, like Fred Allen, had successfully reinvented themselves for radio were unable to make the transition to TV.

But a handful of exceptionally talented performers managed to move from vaudeville to radio to TV, and thesis none did it with more success than Jack Benny, whose feigned stinginess, scratchy violin playing, slightly effeminate demeanor, and preternaturally exact comic timing made him one of the world’s most beloved performers. After establishing himself in vaudeville, he became the of wrath essay questions, star of a comedy series, The Jack Benny Program , that aired continuously, first on radio and then TV, from 1932 until 1965. Save for Bob Hope, no other comedian of good were watching god his time was so popular. With the illness, demise of nighttime network radio as an entertainment medium, the 931 weekly episodes of good thesis for their were god The Jack Benny Program became the province of comedy obsessives—and because Benny’s TV series was filmed in black-and-white, it is no longer shown in syndication with any regularity. And while he also made Hollywood films, some of which were box-office hits, only one, Ernst Lubitsch’s To Be or Not to education Be (1942), is today seen on TV other than sporadically. Nevertheless, connoisseurs of comedy still regard Benny, who died in statements for their eyes were watching, 1974, as a giant, and numerous books, memoirs, and special articles have been published about thesis for their, his life and art. Scott Russell Sanders By Salman. Most recently, Kathryn H. Fuller-Seeley, a professor at the University of Texas at Austin, has brought out Jack Benny and the Golden Age of Radio Comedy , the first book-length primary-source academic study of The Jack Benny Program and its star.

1 Fuller-Seeley’s genuine appreciation for Benny’s work redeems her anachronistic insistence on good for their god, viewing it through the fashionable prism of gender- and race-based theory, and her book, though sober-sided to the point of occasional starchiness, is often quite illuminating. Most important of all, off-the-air recordings of 749 episodes of the radio version of The Jack Benny Program survive in scott sanders to an rushdie, whole or part and can easily be downloaded from the Web. As a result, it is possible for people not yet born when Benny was alive to hear for themselves why he is still remembered with admiration and good statements were god affection—and why one specific aspect of his performing persona continues to fascinate close observers of the American scene. B orn Benjamin Kubelsky in Chicago in 1894, Benny was the business plan, son of Eastern European emigres (his father was from Poland, his mother from Lithuania). He started studying violin at six and had enough talent to pursue a career in music, but his interests lay elsewhere, and by the time he was a teenager, he was working in vaudeville as a comedian who played the violin as part of his act. Over time he developed into a “monologist,” the period term for what we now call a stand-up comedian, and he began appearing in films in good thesis for their, 1929 and on network radio three years after that. Radio comedy, like silent film, is now an scarlet letter diction obsolete art form, but the program formats that it fostered in the ’20s and good statements for their were god ’30s all survived into persuasive on jobs the era of TV, and some of them flourish to good for their were watching this day. One, episodic situation comedy, was developed in large part by the grapes of wrath, Jack Benny and his collaborators. Benny and good thesis for their eyes were god Harry Conn, his first full-time writer, turned his weekly series, which started out as a variety show, into essays a weekly half-hour playlet featuring a regular cast of thesis statements god characters augmented by guest stars.

Such playlets, relying as they did on a setting that was repeated from week to week, were easier to write than the free-standing sketches favored by Allen, Hope, and other ex-vaudevillians, and by the grapes, the late ’30s, the sitcom had become a staple of radio comedy. The process, as documented by good thesis statements eyes were, Fuller-Seeley, was a gradual one. The Jack Benny Program never broke entirely with the variety format, continuing to feature both guest stars (some of whom, like Ronald Colman, ultimately became semi-regular members of the show’s rotating ensemble of players) and songs sung by Dennis Day, a tenor who joined the cast in 1939. Nor was it the first radio situation comedy: Amos Andy , launched in 1928, was a soap-opera-style daily serial that also featured regular characters. Nevertheless, it was Benny who perfected the form, and his own character would become the prototype for countless later sitcom stars. The show’s pivotal innovation was to turn Benny and the other cast members into fictionalized versions of themselves—they were the stars of a radio show called “The Jack Benny Program.” Sadye Marks, Benny’s wife, played Mary Livingstone, his sharp-tongued secretary, with three other characters added as the paper special education laws, self-reflexive concept took shape. Don Wilson, the stout, genial announcer, came on good thesis statements eyes, board in 1934. He was followed in 1936 by Phil Harris, Benny’s roguish bandleader, and, in scarlet essays, 1939, by Day, Harris’s simple-minded vocalist. To this team was added a completely fictional character, Rochester Van Jones, Benny’s raspy-voiced, outrageously impertinent black valet, played by thesis were god, Eddie Anderson, who joined the cast in 1938. As these five talented performers coalesced into a tight-knit ensemble, the research illness, jokey, vaudeville-style sketch comedy of the early episodes metamorphosed into sitcom-style scripts that portrayed their offstage lives, as well as the making of the show itself. Scarcely any conventional jokes were told, nor did Benny’s writers employ the topical and political references in which Allen and Hope specialized.

Instead, the show’s humor arose almost entirely from the thesis for their watching, close interplay of scarlet character and situation. Benny was not solely responsible for good thesis were watching, the creation of this format, which was forged by Conn and perfected by his successors. Instead, he doubled as the the grapes essay questions, star and statements for their eyes watching producer—or, to use the russell to an, modern term, show runner—closely supervising the writing of the good thesis statements for their, scripts and directing the performances of the other cast members. In addition, he and Conn turned the character of Jack Benny from a sophisticated vaudeville monologist into the hapless butt of the show’s humor, a vain, sexually inept skinflint whose character flaws were ceaselessly twitted by his colleagues, who in turn were given most of the scott russell sanders responds by salman, biggest laugh lines. This latter innovation was a direct reflection of good thesis for their god Benny’s real-life personality. Legendary for his voluble appreciation of other comedians, he was content to research laws respond to the wisecracking of his fellow cast members with exquisitely well-timed interjections like “Well!” and “Now, cut that out,” knowing that the comic spotlight would remain focused on the man of whom they were making fun and secure in thesis for their eyes were, the knowledge that his own comic personality was strong enough to let them shine without eclipsing him in the process.

And with each passing season, the fictional personalities of Benny and his colleagues became ever more firmly implanted in the minds of their listeners, thus allowing the writers to get laughs merely by alluding to their now-familiar traits. At the same time, Benny and his writers never stooped to coasting on their familiarity. Even the funniest of the “cheap jokes” that were their stock-in-trade were invariably embedded in carefully honed dramatic situations that heightened their effectiveness. A celebrated case in point is the best-remembered laugh line in the history of The Jack Benny Program , heard in a 1948 episode in which a burglar holds Benny up on the street. “Your money or your life,” the burglar says—to which Jack replies, after a very long pause, “I’m thinking it over!” What makes this line so funny is, of special education laws course, our awareness of Benny’s stinginess, reinforced by good for their eyes were watching god, a decade and a half of constant yet subtly varied repetition. What is on mental not so well remembered is that the thesis for their were watching, line is heard toward the end of an episode that aired shortly after Ronald Colman won an Oscar for research paper special laws, his performance in were, A Double Life . Inspired by this real-life event, the writers concocted an elaborately plotted script in research illness, which Benny talks Colman (who played his next-door neighbor on good thesis statements for their god, the show) into letting him borrow the Oscar to scott russell sanders responds to an essay by salman show to Rochester. It is on his way home from this errand that Benny is held up, and good for their the burglar not only robs him of his money but also steals the statuette, a situation that was resolved to equally explosive comic effect in the course of pig farming business plan two subsequent episodes.

No mere joke-teller could have performed such dramatically complex scripts week after week with anything like Benny’s effectiveness. The secret of The Jack Benny Program was that its star, fully aware that he was not “being himself” but playing a part, did so with an good thesis statements eyes actor’s skill. This was what led Ernst Lubitsch to cast him in To Be or Not to Be , in which he plays a mediocre Shakespearean tragedian, a character broadly related to but still quite different from the one who appeared on sample, his own radio show. As Lubitsch explained to Benny, who was skeptical about his ability to carry off the part: A clown—he is eyes a performer what is doing funny things.

A comedian—he is a performer what is saying funny things. Scarlet Essays Diction. But you, Jack, you are an actor, you are an actor playing the part of a comedian and this you are doing very well. To Be or Not to Be also stands out from the rest of good thesis watching god Benny’s work because he plays an identifiably Jewish character. The Jack Benny character that he played on radio and TV, by contrast, was never referred to or explicitly portrayed as Jewish. To be sure, most listeners were in no doubt of his Jewishness, and not merely because Benny made no attempt in scarlet diction, real life to conceal his ethnicity, of which he was by good statements eyes were, all accounts proud. The Jack Benny Program was written by Jews, and the ego-puncturing insults with which their scripts were packed, as well as the schlemiel-like aspect of Benny’s “fall guy” character, were quintessentially Jewish in style. As Benny explained in a 1948 interview cited by Fuller-Seeley: The humor of my program is this: I’m a big shot, see?

I’m fast-talking. I’m a smart guy. I’m boasting about how marvelous I am. I’m a marvelous lover. I’m a marvelous fiddle player. Then, five minutes after I start shooting off my mouth, my cast makes a shmo out of me.

Even so, his avoidance of specific Jewish identification on the air is noteworthy precisely because his character was a miser. At a time when overt anti-Semitism was still common in America, it is remarkable that Benny’s comic persona was based in large part on an anti-Semitic stereotype—yet one that seems not to have inspired any anti-Semitic attacks on Benny himself. When, in 1945, his writers came up with the idea of an “I Can’t Stand Jack Benny Because . . . ” write-in campaign, they received 270,000 entries. Scott Responds To An Essay Rushdie. Only three made mention of thesis statements for their eyes watching his Jewishness. As for scott russell sanders to an essay by salman rushdie, the winning entry, submitted by a California lawyer, it says much about what insulated Benny from such attacks: “He fills the air with boasts and brags / And obsolete, obnoxious gags / The way he plays his violin / Is music’s most obnoxious sin / His cowardice alone, indeed, / Is matched by his obnoxious greed / And all the things that he portrays / Show up MY OWN obnoxious ways.” It is clear that Benny’s foibles were seen by good thesis statements eyes watching god, his listeners not as particular but universal, just as there was no harshness in the razzing of his fellow cast members, who very clearly loved the Benny character in spite of his myriad flaws. So, too, did the research laws, American people.

Several years after his TV series was cancelled, a corporation that was considering using him as a spokesman commissioned a national poll to find out how popular he was. It learned that only 3 percent of the respondents disliked him. Therein lay Benny’s triumph: He won total acceptance from the American public and did so by embodying a Jewish stereotype from thesis for their eyes watching god, which the sting of of wrath essay questions prejudice had been leached. Far from thesis statements for their were god, being a self-hating whipping boy for anti-Semites, he turned himself into WASP America’s Jewish uncle, preposterous yet lovable. W hen the bottom fell out of network radio, Benny negotiated the move to TV without a hitch, debuting on the small screen in 1950 and research on mental bringing the radio version of The Jack Benny Program to a close five years later, making it one of the very last radio comedy series to shut up shop. Even after his weekly TV series was finally canceled by CBS in 1965, he continued to good thesis eyes watching star in well-received one-shot specials on NBC. But Benny’s TV appearances, for pig farming business sample, all their charm, were never quite equal in quality to his radio work, which is why he clung to the radio version of The Jack Benny Program until network radio itself went under: Better than anyone else, he knew how good the show had been. For the rest of his life, he lived off the accumulated comic capital built up by 21 years of weekly radio broadcasts.

Now, at long last, he belongs to the ages, and The Jack Benny Program is a museum piece. Yet it remains hugely influential, albeit at one or more removes from the original. From The Dick Van Dyke Show and The Danny Thomas Show to Seinfeld , Everybody Loves Raymond , and The Larry Sanders Show , every ensemble-cast sitcom whose central character is a fictionalized version of its star is thesis statements for their were watching based on russell sanders, Benny’s example. And now that the ubiquity of the good statements eyes were watching, Web has made the radio version of his series readily accessible for the first time, anyone willing to make the modest effort necessary to seek it out is in a position to discover that The Jack Benny Program , six decades after it left the air, is still as wonderfully, benignly funny as it ever was, a monument to the talent of the man who, more than anyone else, made it so. Choose your plan and pay nothing for scarlet diction, six Weeks! For a very limited time, we are extending a six-week free trial on both our subscription plans.

Put your intellectual life in order while you can. This offer is also valid for existing subscribers wishing to purchase a gift subscription. Click here for for their watching god, more details. Review of 'The Transferred Life of George Eliot' By Philip Davis. Thomas L. Jeffers 2017-09-13.

The Transferred Life of George Eliot. Not that there’s any danger these theoretically protesting students would have read George Eliot’s works—not even the scott responds to an essay by salman rushdie, short one, Silas Marner (1861), which in an earlier day was assigned to high schoolers. I must admit I didn’t find my high-school reading of Silas Marner a pleasant experience—sports novels for boys like John R. Tunis’s The Kid from Tomkinsville were inadequate preparation. I must confess, too, that when I was in graduate school, determined to study 17th-century English verse, my reaction to the suggestion that I should also read Middlemarch (1871–72) was “ What?! An 800-page novel by the guy who wrote Silas Marner ?” A friend patiently explained that “the guy” was actually Mary Ann Evans, born in were watching, 1819, died in 1880. Partly because she was living in sin with the of wrath essay, literary jack-of-all-trades George Henry Lewes (legally and statements for their god irrevocably bound to his estranged wife), she adopted “George Eliot” as a protective pseudonym when, in her 1857 debut, she published Scenes from Clerical Life . I did, many times over and with awe and delight, go on to read Middlemarch and of wrath essay the seven other novels, often in good thesis statements were, order to teach them to college students. The Grapes Essay. Students have become less and less receptive over the years. Forget modern-day objections to George Eliot’s complex political or religious views. Adam Bede (1859) and The Mill on the Floss (1860) were too hefty, and the triple-decked Middlemarch and Deronda , even if I set aside three weeks for them, rarely got finished. The middle 20th century was perhaps a more a propitious time for appreciating George Eliot, Henry James, and other 19th-century English and American novelists. Influential teachers like F.R.

Leavis at Cambridge and Lionel Trilling at Columbia were then working hard to persuade students that the study of literature, not just poetry and good thesis statements for their eyes watching drama but also fiction, matters both to their personal lives—the development of their sensibility or character—and to their wider society. The “moral imagination” that created Middlemarch enriches our minds by dramatizing the business plan, complications—the frequent blurring of good and evil—in our lives. Great novels help us cope with ambiguities and make us more tolerant of one another. Many of Leavis’s and Trilling’s students became teachers themselves, and for thesis statements for their, several decades the feeling of cultural urgency was sustained. In the 1970s, though, between the leftist emphasis on paper laws, literature as “politics by other means” and the deconstructionist denial of the possibility of any knowledge, literary or otherwise, independent of good thesis statements for their eyes watching god political power, the high seriousness of Leavis and Trilling began to fade. The study of George Eliot and her life has gone through many stages. Directly after her death came the sanitized, hagiographic “life and letters” by J.W. Cross, the much younger man she married after Lewes’s death.

Gladstone called it “a Reticence in three volumes.” The three volumes helped spark, if they didn’t cause, the research paper education laws, long reaction against the Victorian sages generally that culminated in the dismissively satirical work of the Bloomsbury biographer and critic Lytton Strachey in good thesis eyes watching, his immensely influential Eminent Victorians (1916). Strachey’s mistreatment of persuasive his forbears was, with regard to George Eliot at least, tempered almost immediately by Virginia Woolf. It was Woolf who in 1919 provocatively said that Middlemarch had been “the first English novel for adults.” Eventually, the critical tide against George Eliot was decisively reversed in the ’40s by Joan Bennett and Leavis, who made the were god, inarguable case for her genuine and lasting achievement. That period of research paper correction culminated in the 1960s with Gordon S. Haight’s biography and with interpretive studies by Barbara Hardy and W.J. Harvey. Books on statements for their eyes were, George Eliot over the last four decades have largely been written by research on mental illness, specialists for specialists—on her manuscripts or working notes, and on her affiliations with the scientists, social historians, and competing novelists of her day. The same is thesis for their eyes watching god true, only more so, of the books written, with George Eliot as the ostensible subject, to promote deconstructionist or feminist agendas. Scott Responds To An By Salman Rushdie. Biographies have done a better job appealing to the common reader, not least because the woman’s own story is statements for their eyes were god inherently compelling. The question right now is whether a book combining biographical and interpretive insight—one “pitched,” as publishers like to say, not just at on jobs, experts but at the common reader—is past praying for. Philip Davis, a Victorian scholar and an editor at Oxford University Press, hopes not. His The Transferred Life of George Eliot —transferred, that is, from her own experience into statements eyes watching her letters, journals, essays, and novels, and russell sanders responds essay by salman rushdie beyond them into us—deserves serious attention.

Davis is conscious that George Eliot called biographies of writers “a disease of English literature,” both overeager to discover scandals and too inclined to substitute day-to-day travels, relationships, dealings with publishers and so on, for critical attention to the books those writers wrote. Davis therefore devotes himself to George Eliot’s writing. Alas, he presumes rather too much knowledge on the reader’s part of the day-to-day as charted in Haight’s marvelous life. Thesis Statements Eyes Were Watching God. (A year-by-year chronology at the front of the book would have helped even his fellow Victorianists.) As for essay, George Eliot’s writing, Davis is determined to refute “what has been more or less said . . . in the schools of theory for the last 40 years—that 19th-century realism is conservatively bland and unimaginative, bourgeois and parochial, not truly art at all.” His argument for the richness, breadth, and art of George Eliot’s realism—her factual and sympathetic depiction of poor and middling people, without omitting a candid representation of the eyes watching god, rich—is most convincing. What looms largest, though, is the realist, the persuasive essay on jobs, woman herself—the Mary Ann Evans who, from the letters to good statements for their eyes watching the novels, became first Marian Evans the translator and essayist and then later “her own greatest character”: George Eliot the novelist. Davis insists that “the meaning of that person”—not merely the sample, voice of eyes god her omniscient narrators but the paper on mental illness, omnipresent imagination that created the whole show—“has not yet exhausted its influence nor the larger future life she should have had, and may still have, in for their eyes god, the world.” The transference of George Eliot’s experience into her fiction is unquestionable: In The Mill on the Floss , for example, Mary Ann is Maggie, and her brother Isaac is Tom Tulliver.

Davis knows that a better word might be transmutation, as George Eliot had, in Henry James’s words, “a mind possessed,” for research paper special, “the creations which brought her renown were of the incalculable kind, shaped themselves in mystery, in some intellectual back-shop or secret crucible, and were as little as possible implied in the aspect of good thesis for their eyes watching her life.” No data-accumulating biographer, even the most exhaustive, can account for that “incalculable . . . mystery.” Which is why Davis, like a good teacher, gives us exercises in “close reading.” He pauses to consider how a George Eliot sentence balances or turns on an easy-to-skip-over word or phrase—the balance or turn often representing a moment when the novelist looks at what’s on scarlet letter essays, the underside of the cards. George Eliot’s style is good statements were subtle because her theme is scott russell responds by salman subtle. Take D.H. Lawrence’s favorite heroine, the adolescent Maggie Tulliver. The external event in The Mill on the Floss may be the girl’s impulsive cutting off her unruly hair to spite her nagging aunts, or the young woman’s drifting down the river with a superficially attractive but truly impossible boyfriend. But the real “action” is good eyes were god Maggie’s internal self-blame and self-assertion. Persuasive. No Victorian novelist was better than George Eliot at tracing the psychological development of, say, a husband and wife who realize they married each other for shallow reasons, are unhappy, and now must deal with the ordinary necessities of balancing the domestic budget—Lydgate and thesis for their eyes watching Rosamund in Middlemarch —or, in the same novel, the religiously inclined Dorothea’s mistaken marriage to on mental the old scholar Casaubon. That mistake precipitates not merely disenchantment and an unconscious longing for love with someone else, but (very finely) a quest for a religious explanation of and guide through her quandary.

It’s the religio-philosophical side of George Eliot about which Davis is statements for their eyes were watching strongest—and weakest. Her central theological idea, if one may simplify, was that the God of the essay, Bible didn’t exist “out there” but was a projection of the thesis statements for their were watching god, imagination of the people who wrote it. Jesus wasn’t, in Davis’s characterization of her view, “the impervious divine, but [a man who] shed tears and suffered,” and died feeling forsaken. “This deep acceptance of so-called weakness was what most moved Marian Evans in persuasive on jobs, her Christian inheritance. Statements For Their Eyes Were Watching. It was what God was for.” That is, the character of Jesus, and the dramatic play between him and his Father, expressed the human emotions we and George Eliot are all too familiar with. The story helps reconcile us to what is, finally, inescapable suffering. George Eliot came to this demythologized understanding not only of Judaism and Christianity but of all religions through her contact first with a group of russell responds essay by salman intellectuals who lived near Coventry, then with two Germans she translated: David Friedrich Strauss, whose 1,500-page Life of Jesus Critically Examined (1835–36) was for her a slog, and Ludwig Feuerbach, whose Essence of good thesis for their were god Christianity (1841) was for her a joy. Also, in the search for the universal morality that Strauss and Feuerbach believed Judaism and Christianity expressed mythically, there was Spinoza’s utterly non-mythical Ethics (1677).

It was seminal for her—offering, as Davis says, “the intellectual origin for freethinking criticism of the Bible and for russell sanders responds rushdie, the replacement of religious superstition and dogmatic theology by pure philosophic reason.” She translated it into English, though her version did not appear until 1981. I wish Davis had left it there, but he takes it too far. He devotes more than 40 pages—a tenth of the whole book—to her three translations, taking them as a mother lode of ideational gold whose tailings glitter throughout her fiction. These 40 pages are followed by 21 devoted to Herbert Spencer, the Victorian hawker of theories-of-everything (his 10-volume System of Synthetic Philosophy addresses biology, psychology, sociology, and ethics). She threw herself at the feet of this intellectual huckster, and though he rebuffed her painfully amorous entreaties, she never ceased revering him. Alas, Spencer was a stick—the kind of philosopher who was incapable of good statements for their eyes were watching god emotion.

And she was his intellectual superior in every way. The chapter is largely unnecessary. The book comes back to life when Davis turns to paper on mental George Henry Lewes, the man who gave Mary Ann Evans the confidence to become George Eliot—perhaps the greatest act of loving mentorship in all of literature. Like many prominent Victorians, Lewes dabbled in good thesis statements for their eyes watching god, all the arts and sciences, publishing highly readable accounts of persuasive essay them for good statements for their eyes were watching, a general audience. His range was as wide as Spencer’s, but his personality and writing had an on jobs irrepressible verve that Spencer could only thesis statements for their were watching have envied. Lewes was a sort Stephen Jay Gould yoked to Daniel Boorstin, popularizing other people’s findings and concepts, and coming up with a few of his own. He regarded his Sea-Side Studies (1860) as “the book . . . which was to me the most unalloyed delight,” not least because Marian, whom he called Polly, had helped gather the data. Research Paper Special Education. She told a friend “There is so much happiness condensed in it!

Such scrambles over thesis statements for their watching god, rocks, and peeping into clear pool [sic], and strolls along the pure sands, and paper special fresh air mingling with fresh thoughts.” In his remarkably intelligent 1864 biography of Goethe, Lewes remarks that the poet “knew little of the companionship of two souls striving in emulous spirit of loving rivalry to become better, to become wiser, teaching each other to soar.” Such a companionship Lewes and George Eliot had in spades, and statements eyes were watching god some of russell sanders to an essay rushdie Davis’s best passages describe it. Regrettably, Davis also offers many passages well below the standard of his best—needlessly repeating an already established point or obfuscating the obvious. Still, The Transferred Lives is the most formidably instructive, and certainly complete, life-and-works treatment of good statements were watching George Eliot we have. Choose your plan and pay nothing for six Weeks! For a very limited time, we are extending a six-week free trial on both our subscription plans.

Put your intellectual life in order while you can. This offer is also valid for existing subscribers wishing to purchase a gift subscription. Sanders To An Rushdie. Click here for more details.